Lattice versus structure, dimensionality versus periodicity: a crystallographic Babel?
In this article, several mistakes occurring in the description of crystal structures are pointed out. (1) The term `lattice' is often used instead of `structure'. (2) The two terms `superlattice' and `sublattice' are incorrectly interchanged. (3) Substructures composed of a subse...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied crystallography 2019-04, Vol.52 (2), p.451-456 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In this article, several mistakes occurring in the description of crystal structures are pointed out. (1) The term `lattice' is often used instead of `structure'. (2) The two terms `superlattice' and `sublattice' are incorrectly interchanged. (3) Substructures composed of a subset of the crystallographic orbits composing the structure are incorrectly called `sublattices'. (4) Subperiodic structures are incorrectly referred to as `low‐dimensional' structures.
The incorrect yet widespread use of terms `lattice', with or without the modifiers `super' and `sub', and `low‐dimensional structure' is pointed out, and simple guidelines for a correct use are given. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1600-5767 0021-8898 1600-5767 |
DOI: | 10.1107/S1600576719000463 |