The change on vertebral axial rotation after posterior instrumentation of idiopathic scoliosis

Purpose Agreement between the correction objectives and the instrumentation strategies remains controversial in idiopathic scoliosis. Most studies have focus on the frontal and sagittal plane. The goal of this study was to evaluate the change on vertebral axial rotation after posterior instrumentati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Child's nervous system 2015-12, Vol.31 (12), p.2325-2331
Hauptverfasser: Courvoisier, Aurélien, Garin, Christophe, Vialle, Raphaël, Kohler, Rémi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Agreement between the correction objectives and the instrumentation strategies remains controversial in idiopathic scoliosis. Most studies have focus on the frontal and sagittal plane. The goal of this study was to evaluate the change on vertebral axial rotation after posterior instrumentation in fused and unfused segments. Methods Fourteen patients operated on for idiopathic scoliosis were prospectively included. Fusion and instrumentation were done by posterior approach. All patients had a pre-operative and a 10-day post-operative radiological evaluation with the EOS system. Axial orientation of the vertebrae with special interest to the apical, junctional, and unfused areas was obtained thanks to the reconstruction software. Results Mean apical vertebra axial rotation statistically decreased from 21° pre-operatively to 13° post-operatively. But, there were no statistically significant differences between pre-operative and post-operative mean axial intervertebral rotations in the main curve and axial rotation of the non-instrumented lower counter curve. Conclusions 3D analysis of the spine in standing position is a great advancement for post-operative analysis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) corrections. This study confirmed that actual instrumentations are able to achieve “en bloc” 3D correction of the spine but not intervertebral axial rotation correction.
ISSN:0256-7040
1433-0350
DOI:10.1007/s00381-015-2891-3