Exposure to hypobaric hypoxia results in higher oxidative stress compared to normobaric hypoxia

Abstract Sixteen healthy exercise trained participants underwent the following three, 10-h exposures in a randomized manner: (1) Hypobaric hypoxia (HH; 3450 m terrestrial altitude) (2) Normobaric hypoxia (NH; 3450 m simulated altitude) and (3) Normobaric normoxia (NN). Plasma oxidative stress (malon...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Respiratory physiology & neurobiology 2016-03, Vol.223, p.23-27
Hauptverfasser: Ribon, A, Pialoux, V, Saugy, J.J, Rupp, T, Faiss, R, Debevec, T, Millet, G.P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Sixteen healthy exercise trained participants underwent the following three, 10-h exposures in a randomized manner: (1) Hypobaric hypoxia (HH; 3450 m terrestrial altitude) (2) Normobaric hypoxia (NH; 3450 m simulated altitude) and (3) Normobaric normoxia (NN). Plasma oxidative stress (malondialdehyde, MDA; advanced oxidation protein products, AOPP) and antioxidant markers (superoxide dismutase, SOD; glutathione peroxidase, GPX; catalase; ferric reducing antioxidant power, FRAP) were measured before and after each exposure. MDA was significantly higher after HH compared to NN condition (+24%). SOD and GPX activities were increased (vs. before; +29% and +54%) while FRAP was decreased (vs. before; −34%) only after 10 h of HH. AOPP significantly increased after 10 h for NH (vs. before; +83%), and HH (vs. before; +99%) whereas it remained stable in NN. These results provide evidence that prooxidant/antioxidant balance was impaired to a greater degree following acute exposure to terrestrial (HH) vs. simulated altitude (NH) and that the chamber confinement (NN) did likely not explain these differences.
ISSN:1569-9048
1878-1519
DOI:10.1016/j.resp.2015.12.008