Mismatch negativity to predict subsequent awakening in deeply sedated critically ill patients

Mismatch negativity (MMN) is the neurophysiological correlate of cognitive integration of novel stimuli. Although MMN is a well-established predictor of awakening in non-sedated comatose patients, its prognostic value in deeply sedated critically ill patients remains unknown. The aim of this prospec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of anaesthesia : BJA 2018-12, Vol.121 (6), p.1290-1297
Hauptverfasser: Azabou, E., Rohaut, B., Porcher, R., Heming, N., Kandelman, S., Allary, J., Moneger, G., Faugeras, F., Sitt, J.D., Annane, D., Lofaso, F., Chrétien, F., Mantz, J., Naccache, L., Sharshar, T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Mismatch negativity (MMN) is the neurophysiological correlate of cognitive integration of novel stimuli. Although MMN is a well-established predictor of awakening in non-sedated comatose patients, its prognostic value in deeply sedated critically ill patients remains unknown. The aim of this prospective, observational pilot study was to investigate the prognostic value of MMN for subsequent awakening in deeply sedated critically ill patients. MMN was recorded in 43 deeply sedated critically ill patients on Day 3 of ICU admission using a classical ‘odd-ball’ paradigm that delivers rare deviant sounds in a train of frequent standard sounds. Individual visual analyses and a group level analysis of recordings were performed. MMN amplitudes were then analysed according to the neurological status (awake vs not awake) at Day 28. Median (inter-quartile range) Richmond Assessment Sedation Scale (RASS) at the time of recording was −5 (range, from −5 to −4.5). Visual detection of MMN revealed a poor inter-rater agreement [kappa=0.17, 95% confidence interval (0.07–0.26)]. On Day 28, 30 (70%) patients had regained consciousness while 13 (30%) had not. Quantitative group level analysis revealed a significantly greater MMN amplitude for patients who awakened compared with those who had not [mean (standard deviation) = −0.65 (1.4) vs 0.08 (0.17) μV, respectively; P=0.003). MMN can be observed in deeply sedated critically ill patients and could help predict subsequent awakening. However, visual analysis alone is unreliable and should be systematically completed with individual level statistics.
ISSN:0007-0912
1471-6771
DOI:10.1016/j.bja.2018.06.029