Evidential framework for Error Correcting Output Code classification

The Error Correcting Output Codes offer a proper matrix framework to model the decomposition of a multiclass classification problem into simpler subproblems. How to perform the decomposition to best fit the data while using a small number of classifiers has been a research hotspot, as well as the de...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Engineering applications of artificial intelligence 2018-08, Vol.73, p.10-21
Hauptverfasser: Lachaize, Marie, Hégarat-Mascle, Sylvie Le, Aldea, Emanuel, Maitrot, Aude, Reynaud, Roger
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The Error Correcting Output Codes offer a proper matrix framework to model the decomposition of a multiclass classification problem into simpler subproblems. How to perform the decomposition to best fit the data while using a small number of classifiers has been a research hotspot, as well as the decoding part, which deals with the subproblem combination. In this work, we propose an evidential unified framework that handles both the coding and decoding steps. Using the Belief Function Theory, we propose an efficient modelling, where each dichotomizer in the ECOC strategy is considered as an independent information source. This framework allows us to easily model the refutation information provided by sparse dichotomizers and also to derive measures to detect tricky samples for which additional dichotomizers could be needed to ensure decisions. Our approach was tested on hyperspectral data used to classify nine different types of material. According to the results obtained, our approach allows us to achieve top performance using compact ECOC while presenting a high level of modularity. •BF framework provides elegant modeling of classifier information in ECOC approach.•Classifier coding and decoding steps are handled simultaneously using BF operators.•Refutation modeling of sparse dichotomizer response avoids bias in the decoding step.•Imprecision or conflict measures are used as drift indicators versus training step.•Statistics on class ambiguities allow for dynamic choice of additional dichotomizers.
ISSN:0952-1976
1873-6769
DOI:10.1016/j.engappai.2018.04.019