Standardized Method to Measure Muscle Force at the Bedside in Hemodialysis Patients

Objectives In hemodialysis, diminution of muscle strength constitutes a major prognostic factor of mortality. Currently, measurement of quadriceps isometric maximal voluntary force (MVF) represents the reference method to investigate muscle strength. However, reduction of MVF is rarely detected in t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of renal nutrition 2017-05, Vol.27 (3), p.194-200
Hauptverfasser: Souweine, Jean-Sébastien, MD, Msc, Boudet, Agathe, MD, Chenine, Leila, MD, Msc, Leray, Helene, MD, Rodriguez, Annie, PhD, Mourad, Georges, MD, PhD, Mercier, Jacques, MD, PhD, Cristol, Jean-Paul, MD, PhD, Hayot, Maurice, MD, PhD, Gouzi, Fares, MD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives In hemodialysis, diminution of muscle strength constitutes a major prognostic factor of mortality. Currently, measurement of quadriceps isometric maximal voluntary force (MVF) represents the reference method to investigate muscle strength. However, reduction of MVF is rarely detected in these patients due to the absence of portative bedside tools in clinical practice. The purposes of this study were therefore to assess the agreement of a belt-stabilized handheld dynamometer (HHD) with the dynamometer chair (reference method) and to determine intratester and intertester reliability of the quadriceps MVF measurements using belt-stabilized HHD in healthy subjects and in hemodialysis patients. Design Repeated-measures cross-sectional study. Setting Clinical and academic hospital. Participants Fifty-three healthy adult subjects (23 males, 36.5 + 12.5 y.o.) and 21 hemodialysis patients (14 males, 72.4 + 13.3 y.o., dialysis vintage 30 + 75.1 months). Intervention Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure MVF measurements were assessed with belt-stabilized HHD and dynamometer chair, by two independent investigators. The agreement between the two devices would be quantified using the Bland–Altman 95% limits of agreement (LOA) method and the Spearman correlation. Results For healthy subjects and hemodialysis patients, Spearman coefficients between belt-stabilized HHD and dynamometer chair were 0.63 and 0.75, respectively ( P  
ISSN:1051-2276
1532-8503
DOI:10.1053/j.jrn.2017.01.017