Mechanical Alterations to Repeated Treadmill Sprints in Normobaric Hypoxia

PURPOSECompelling evidence suggests larger performance decrements during hypoxic versus normoxic repeated sprinting. Yet the underlying mechanical alterations have not been thoroughly investigated. Therefore, we examined the effects of different levels of normobaric hypoxia on running mechanical per...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medicine and science in sports and exercise 2016-08, Vol.48 (8), p.1570-1579
Hauptverfasser: BROCHERIE, FRANCK, MILLET, GRÉGOIRE P, MORIN, JEAN-BENOIT, GIRARD, OLIVIER
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:PURPOSECompelling evidence suggests larger performance decrements during hypoxic versus normoxic repeated sprinting. Yet the underlying mechanical alterations have not been thoroughly investigated. Therefore, we examined the effects of different levels of normobaric hypoxia on running mechanical performance during repeated treadmill sprinting. METHODSThirteen team sport athletes performed eight 5-s sprints with 25 s of passive recovery on an instrumented treadmill in either normoxia near sea level (SL; FiO2 = 20.9%), moderate normobaric hypoxia (MH; FiO2 = 16.8%; corresponding to ~1800 m altitude), or severe normobaric hypoxia (SH; FiO2 = 13.3%; ~3600 m). RESULTSNet power output in the horizontal direction did not differ (P > 0.05) between conditions for the first sprint (mean ± SD, pooled values13.09 ± 1.97 W·kg) but was lower for the eight sprints in SH compared with SL (−7.3% ± 5.5%, P < 0.001) and MH (−7.1% ± 5.9%, P < 0.01), with no difference between SL and MH (+0.1% ± 8.0%, P = 1.00). Sprint decrement score was similar between conditions (pooled values−11.4% ± 7.9%, P = 0.49). Mean vertical, horizontal, and resultant ground reaction forces decreased (P < 0.001) from the first to the last repetition in all conditions (pooled values−2.4% ± 1.9%, −8.6% ± 6.5%, and −2.4% ± 1.9%). This was further accompanied by larger kinematic (mainly contact time+4.0% ± 2.9%, P < 0.001, and +3.3% ± 3.6%, P < 0.05, respectively; stride frequency−2.3% ± 2.0%, P < 0.01, and −2.3% ± 2.8%, P < 0.05, respectively) and spring-mass characteristics (mainly vertical stiffness−6.0% ± 3.9% and −5.1% ± 5.7%, respectively, P < 0.01) fatigue-induced changes in SH compared with SL and MH. CONCLUSIONIn SH, impairments in repeated sprint ability and in associated kinetics/kinematics and spring-mass characteristics exceed those observed near SL and in MH (i.e., no or minimal difference). Specifically, SH accentuates the repeated sprint ability fatigue-related inability to effectively apply forward-oriented ground reaction force and to maintain vertical stiffness and stride frequency.
ISSN:0195-9131
1530-0315
DOI:10.1249/MSS.0000000000000937