Reproducibility of the Adapted Leger and Boucher Test for wheelchair-dependent athletes

Study design:  This study analyzed the reproducibility of a field test. In a previous study, we showed that this test, the Adapted Leger and Boucher Test (ALBT), was progressive and maximal. The Leger and Boucher predictive equation for able-bodied subjects was not accurate for WD athletes, however,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Spinal cord 1999-02, Vol.37 (2), p.129-135
Hauptverfasser: Poulain, M, Vinet, A, Bernard, PL, Varray, A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Study design:  This study analyzed the reproducibility of a field test. In a previous study, we showed that this test, the Adapted Leger and Boucher Test (ALBT), was progressive and maximal. The Leger and Boucher predictive equation for able-bodied subjects was not accurate for WD athletes, however, and a new predictive equation is needed. Objectives:  To determine the reproducibility of an adapted incremental field test for wheelchair-dependent (WD) athletes. Setting:  France at Montpellier. Methods:  The proposed protocol was conducted on a 400 m track. Eight male paraplegics (mean age: 30.8±5.1 years) performed the test three times in the same conditions, ie same time of day, same wheelchair, same material. Maximal heart rate (HRmax) and maximal speed (Smax) were measured. Results:  We found no significant differences ( P >0.05) between tests for either variable. The Bland and Altman graphic analyses showed a good reproducibility for both variables. Lastly, the reproducibility coefficients of HRmax and Smax were very low (2% and 1%, respectively). Conclusion:  The ALBT is reproducible concerning measurements of HRmax and Smax. A valid predictive equation of maximal oxygen uptake from the Smax is now needed for WD athletes during this field test.
ISSN:1362-4393
1476-5624
1362-4393
DOI:10.1038/sj.sc.3100774