Neurophysiological insights on flexibility improvements through motor imagery

•We tested the effect of motor imagery on flexibility using a sit-and-reach paradigm.•Motor imagery improved flexibility and was associated with reduced muscle activation.•Such improvement may be grounded in a cortical gain over spinal reflexes. The efficacy of motor imagery (MI) practice to facilit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Behavioural brain research 2017-07, Vol.331, p.159-168
Hauptverfasser: Kanthack, Thiago Ferreira Dias, Guillot, Aymeric, Papaxanthis, Charalambos, Guizard, Théophile, Collet, Christian, Di Rienzo, Franck
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•We tested the effect of motor imagery on flexibility using a sit-and-reach paradigm.•Motor imagery improved flexibility and was associated with reduced muscle activation.•Such improvement may be grounded in a cortical gain over spinal reflexes. The efficacy of motor imagery (MI) practice to facilitate muscle stretching remains controversial and the underlying neurophysiological mechanisms unexplored. We evaluated the effects of MI practice during a sit-and-reach task. Healthy participants were randomly assigned to a MI practice (n = 15) or Control (n = 15) group and completed 2 blocks of 5 sit-and-reach trials. During the first block (B1), participants performed 5 maximal stretching trials of 10s. During the second block (B2), trials were divided into two consecutive parts: i) reproducing the maximum performance of B1 (10s, B2 part 1), and ii) attempting to outperform the maximum performance of B1 (10s, B2 part 2). Participants performed kinesthetic MI of hamstring stretching during B2 trials in the MI practice group. We recorded electromyography from the hamstring and rectus femoris of the dominant leg. We also processed skin conductance as an index of sympathetic activity. We measured greater performance improvements from B1 to B2 part 2 in the MI practice group compared to Control (p 
ISSN:0166-4328
1872-7549
DOI:10.1016/j.bbr.2017.05.004