Overview of the predictive value of quantitative 18 FDG PET in head and neck cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy

Highlights • SUVMax is a poor predictive parameter when compared with volumetric parameters (MTV, TLG). • MTV and/or TLG pre-treatment are well correlated with clinical outcome. • MTV had a better predictive value than GTV and/or AJCC staging.

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Critical reviews in oncology/hematology 2016-12, Vol.108, p.40-51
Hauptverfasser:	Castelli, J, Bari, B. De, Depeursinge, A, Simon, A, Devillers, A, Jimenez, G. Roman, Prior, J, Ozsahin, M, Crevoisier, R.de, Bourhis, J
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Bioengineering Cancer Chemoradiotherapy Clinical outcome Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 Glycolysis Head and neck cancer Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Head and Neck Neoplasms - therapy Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine Humans Imaging Life Sciences PET Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	Highlights • SUVMax is a poor predictive parameter when compared with volumetric parameters (MTV, TLG). • MTV and/or TLG pre-treatment are well correlated with clinical outcome. • MTV had a better predictive value than GTV and/or AJCC staging.
ISSN:	1040-8428 1879-0461
DOI:	10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.10.009