Comparison of 1800 Robotic and Open Partial Nephrectomies for Renal Tumors

Background Only a few studies have compared the outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) and open partial nephrectomy (OPN). This study aimed to compare perioperative and oncologic outcomes of RPN and OPN. Methods The data of all patients who underwent partial nephrectomy from 2006 to 2014 in s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgical oncology 2016-12, Vol.23 (13), p.4277-4283
Hauptverfasser: Peyronnet, Benoit, Seisen, Thomas, Oger, Emmanuel, Vaessen, Christophe, Grassano, Yohann, Benoit, Thibaut, Carrouget, Julie, Pradère, Benjamin, Khene, Zineddine, Giwerc, Anthony, Mathieu, Romain, Beauval, Jean-Baptiste, Nouhaud, François-Xavier, Bigot, Pierre, Doumerc, Nicolas, Bernhard, Jean-Christophe, Mejean, Arnaud, Patard, Jean-Jacques, Shariat, Sharokh, Roupret, Morgan, Bensalah, Karim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Only a few studies have compared the outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) and open partial nephrectomy (OPN). This study aimed to compare perioperative and oncologic outcomes of RPN and OPN. Methods The data of all patients who underwent partial nephrectomy from 2006 to 2014 in six academic departments of urology were retrospectively collected. Perioperative outcomes were compared between OPN and RPN patients. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Results The study included 1800 patients: 937 who underwent RPN and 863 who underwent OPN. The patients in the robotic group had smaller tumors (33.1 vs. 39.9 mm; p  
ISSN:1068-9265
1534-4681
DOI:10.1245/s10434-016-5411-0