Parenchymal FLAIR hyperintensity before thrombolysis is a prognostic factor of ischemic stroke outcome at 3 Tesla
Summary Background The goal of the present study was to determine whether the presence or absence of parenchymal FLAIR hyperintensity alone, before thrombolysis, might be a predictive factor of ischemic stroke outcomes after the acute phase of stroke and at 3 months. Materials and methods We retrosp...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of neuroradiology 2015-10, Vol.42 (5), p.269-277 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Summary Background The goal of the present study was to determine whether the presence or absence of parenchymal FLAIR hyperintensity alone, before thrombolysis, might be a predictive factor of ischemic stroke outcomes after the acute phase of stroke and at 3 months. Materials and methods We retrospectively included 84 patients with an ischemic stroke between November 2007 and March 2012, who underwent 3 T MRI, were treated by thrombolysis, and had medical follow-up at 3 months. Two readers analyzed parenchymal FLAIR visibility. Logistic regressions were performed for NIHSS difference (NIHSS at admission – NIHSS at the end of hospitalization) and for 3 months modified Ranking Score (mRS). Predictive values of positive parenchymal FLAIR for identifying poor outcome at discharge and at 3 months were estimated. Results Parenchymal FLAIR positivity was not predictive of NIHSS difference but it predicted poor outcome at 3 months (sensitivity: 0.49 [0.37–0.60], specificity: 0.69 [0.46–0.91], positive predictive value: 0.87 [0.76–0.98] and negative predictive value: 0.24 [0.12–0.36]). Conclusions At 3 Tesla, the presence of a parenchymal hyperintense FLAIR signal before thrombolysis is predictive of a poor clinical outcome at 3 months. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0150-9861 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.neurad.2015.04.008 |