Incipient fault amplitude estimation using KL divergence with a probabilistic approach

The Kullback–Leibler (KL) divergence is at the centre of Information Theory and change detection. It is characterized with a high sensitivity to incipient faults that cause unpredictable small changes in the process measurements. This work yields an analytical model based on the KL divergence to est...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Signal processing 2016-03, Vol.120, p.1-7
Hauptverfasser: Harmouche, Jinane, Delpha, Claude, Diallo, Demba
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The Kullback–Leibler (KL) divergence is at the centre of Information Theory and change detection. It is characterized with a high sensitivity to incipient faults that cause unpredictable small changes in the process measurements. This work yields an analytical model based on the KL divergence to estimate the incipient fault magnitude in multivariate processes. In practice, the divergence has no closed form and it must be numerically approximated. In the particular case of incipient fault, the numerical approximation of the divergence causes many false alarms and missed detections because of the slight effect of the incipient fault. In this paper, the ability and relevance to estimate the incipient fault amplitude using the numerical divergence is studied. The divergence is approximated through the calculation of discrete probabilities for faultless and faulty signals. The estimation results that are obtained by simulation induce an error lower than 1% on the fault amplitude. •We propose an analytical model based on KL divergence to estimate fault severity.•We show ability and relevance to estimate fault amplitude in multivariate process.•We approximate the divergence through calculation of discrete probabilities.•The fault severity estimation results are obtained with an error lower than 1%.
ISSN:0165-1684
1872-7557
DOI:10.1016/j.sigpro.2015.08.008