Quantitative comparison of segmentation algorithms for FIB‐SEM images of porous media

Summary Focused ion beam tomography has proven to be capable of imaging porous structures on a nano‐scale. However, due to shine‐through artefacts, common segmentation algorithms often lead to severe dislocation of individual structures in z‐direction. Recently, a number of approaches have been deve...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of microscopy (Oxford) 2015-01, Vol.257 (1), p.23-30
Hauptverfasser: SALZER, M., PRILL, T., SPETTL, A., JEULIN, D., SCHLADITZ, K., SCHMIDT, V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Focused ion beam tomography has proven to be capable of imaging porous structures on a nano‐scale. However, due to shine‐through artefacts, common segmentation algorithms often lead to severe dislocation of individual structures in z‐direction. Recently, a number of approaches have been developed, which take into account the specific nature of focused ion beam‐scanning electron microscope images for porous media. In the present study, we analyse three of these approaches by comparing their performance based on simulated focused ion beam‐scanning electron microscope images. Performance is measured by determining the amount of misclassified voxels as well as the fidelity of structural characteristics. Based on this analysis we conclude that each algorithm has certain strengths and weaknesses and we determine the scenarios for which each approach might be the best choice
ISSN:0022-2720
1365-2818
DOI:10.1111/jmi.12182