Different policy scenarios to promote various targets of biodiversity

► Economic standpoint is integrated to studies of impact of agriculture on biodiversity. ► Dynamic spatially bio-economic modelling is built at the landscape level for France. ► Trends in the five bird indicators are contrasted according the agriculture scenarios. ► Synergies between public incentiv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecological indicators 2012-03, Vol.14 (1), p.209-221
Hauptverfasser: Mouysset, L., Doyen, L., Jiguet, F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:► Economic standpoint is integrated to studies of impact of agriculture on biodiversity. ► Dynamic spatially bio-economic modelling is built at the landscape level for France. ► Trends in the five bird indicators are contrasted according the agriculture scenarios. ► Synergies between public incentives could be a leverage to promote biodiversity. Biodiversity loss in farmlands is widely documented, and agriculture intensification has been identified as a main driver of this decline. Numerous agri-environmental policies have been implemented to assess the negative impacts of agricultural intensification on biodiversity. However, most published studies focus on land-use scenarios, thus neglecting the economic dimension. We develop a bio-economic spatially explicit modelling across 620 small French agricultural areas, which couples a public decision maker under budgetary constraint, regional economic agents in a context of uncertainty and breeding bird dynamics. Using dynamic models, we analyse the direct impacts of several current economic scenarios of the Common Agriculture Policy on common bird communities through five ecological indicators, all related to breeding populations of birds in farmlands: the farmland bird index (FBI), a generalist bird index (GBI), the Shannon diversity index, a community specialization index (CSI) and a community trophic index (CTI). We consider these indicators to scan various functional traits of bird communities. Trends in the different indicators are significantly contrasted pending on economic policy scenarios. Scenarios promoting intensive crops lead to small but specialized communities with more granivorous species, hence a low trophic level for the community. By contrast, promoting extensive grasslands increases the population size, enhances high trophic level but decreases community specialization. Evaluation of agricultural policies should not rely on a single indicator per taxonomic group. In the context of potential reversal of current bird declines, bio-economic modelling, involving farmland incomes, is proposed as a relevant support for decision making about sustainable agri-environmental policies. Promoting extensive grasslands is essential for the sustainable management of bird communities and agriculture. We, however, reveal more complex economic effects and synergies between public incentives, which appear to give interesting leverage for enhancing the bio-economic effectiveness of agricultural policies.
ISSN:1470-160X
1872-7034
DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.08.012