Perioperative outcomes after totally robotic gastric bypass: a prospective nonrandomized controlled study

Abstract Background Perioperative short-term outcomes could be improved after totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (TR-RYGBP) compared with conventional laparoscopic gastric bypass. Methods This is a nonrandomized controlled prospective study (N = 200) to evaluate perioperative short-term outcom...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of surgery 2013-08, Vol.206 (2), p.145-151
Hauptverfasser: Benizri, Emmanuel I., M.D, Renaud, Myriam, M.D, Reibel, Nicolas, M.D, Germain, Adeline, M.D, Ziegler, Olivier, M.D, Zarnegar, Rasa, M.D, Ayav, Ahmet, M.D, Bresler, Laurent, M.D, Brunaud, Laurent, M.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background Perioperative short-term outcomes could be improved after totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (TR-RYGBP) compared with conventional laparoscopic gastric bypass. Methods This is a nonrandomized controlled prospective study (N = 200) to evaluate perioperative short-term outcomes. The primary endpoint was to investigate risk factors for 30-day surgical complications. Results Mean total operative time was shorter in patients who underwent TR-RYGBP (130 vs 147 minutes; P < .0001). However, postoperative surgical complications rate (13% vs 1%; P = .001), and mean overall hospital stay (9.3 vs 6.7 days; P < .0001) were higher after TR-RYGBP. By multivariate analysis, robotic surgery (hazard ratio [HR] = 15.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8 to 280; P = .01), and conversion to laparotomy (HR = 18.8; 95% CI, 1.7 to 250.8; P = .014) were independent risk factors for 30-day surgical complications. Conclusions Although robotic gastric bypass reduces mean operative time, TR-RYGBP is associated with an increased postoperative surgical complications rate and longer hospitalization.
ISSN:0002-9610
1879-1883
DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.07.049