Liver methylene fraction by dual- and triple-echo gradient-echo imaging at 3.0T: Correlation with proton MR spectroscopy and estimation of robustness after SPIO administration

Purpose To assess the systematic errors in liver methylene fraction (LMF) resulting from fat–fat interference effects with dual‐ and triple‐echo gradient‐recalled‐echo Dual/Triple GRE) sequences and to test the robustness of these sequences after iron overloading. Materials and Methods Forty type‐2...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2011-01, Vol.33 (1), p.119-127
Hauptverfasser: Guiu, Boris, Petit, Jean-Michel, Loffroy, Romaric, Aho, Serge, Ben Salem, Douraied, Masson, David, Robin, Isabelle, Vergès, Bruno, Hillon, Patrick, Cercueil, Jean-Pierre, Krausé, Denis
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To assess the systematic errors in liver methylene fraction (LMF) resulting from fat–fat interference effects with dual‐ and triple‐echo gradient‐recalled‐echo Dual/Triple GRE) sequences and to test the robustness of these sequences after iron overloading. Materials and Methods Forty type‐2 diabetic patients underwent LMF measurement by 3.0T 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy (corrected for T1 and T2 decays) as the reference standard and liver fat fraction (%Fat) measurement by four Dual/Triple GRE sequences with 20° and 60° flip angle (α), corrected for T1 recovery. The same four sequences were repeated in eight patients after ferumoxide injection. Corrections for systematic errors were determined from the linear regressions (spectroscopy LMF values over Dual/Triple GRE %Fat values). Robustness was tested using Wilcoxon's signed‐rank test. Results Fat–fat interference effects produced a ∼10% relative systematic error and T2* decay produced a 1.9%–4.2% absolute systematic error in LMF. When comparing before and after ferumoxide, dual‐echo imaging with α = 20° and α = 60°, even when corrected, showed absolute differences of 7.23% [2.81%–10.25%] (P = 0.0117) and 5.65% [1.89%–8.216.8%] (P = 0.0117), respectively; compared to only 1.17% [0.08%–2.83%] (P = 0.0251) and 1.15% [0.37%–2.73%] (P = 0.2626) with triple‐echo imaging and α = 20° and α = 60°, respectively. Conclusion Triple‐echo imaging with α = 60° corrected for both T1 recovery and fat–fat interference effects is robust after superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) administration and can reliably quantify LMF. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2011;33:119–127. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
ISSN:1053-1807
1522-2586
DOI:10.1002/jmri.22390