Robust analysis of cavitating flows in the Venturi tube
Modeling the complex physical structures of cavitating flows makes numerical simulation far to be predictive, and still a challenging issue. Understanding the role of physical and parametric uncertainties in cavitating flows is of primary importance in order to obtain reliable numerical solutions. I...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of mechanics, B, Fluids B, Fluids, 2014-03, Vol.44, p.88-99 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Modeling the complex physical structures of cavitating flows makes numerical simulation far to be predictive, and still a challenging issue. Understanding the role of physical and parametric uncertainties in cavitating flows is of primary importance in order to obtain reliable numerical solutions. In this paper, the impact of various sources of uncertainty on the prediction of cavitating flows is analyzed by coupling a non-intrusive stochastic method with a cavitating CFD solver. The proposed analysis is applied to a Venturi tube, where experimental data concerning vapor formation are available in the literature. Numerical solutions with their associated error bars are compared to the experimental curves displaying a large sensitivity to the uncertainties of inlet boundary conditions. Furthermore, this is confirmed by computing the hierarchy of most predominant uncertainties by means of an ANOVA analysis. Finally, a simple algorithm is proposed in order to provide an optimized set of parameters for the cavitation model, thus permitting to obtain a deterministic solution equal to the most probable one when considering physical inlet uncertainties.
•A polynomial chaos based analysis of a cavitating flow in a Venturi is performed.•A cross-validation is performed for computing most predominant uncertainties.•A third-order polynomial chaos expansion is sufficient to attain convergence.•Experimental inlet uncertainties are predominant w.r.t. model uncertainty.•Epistemic uncertainty are calibrated by means of statistics and optimization. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0997-7546 1873-7390 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.euromechflu.2013.11.002 |