Cumulative t-link threshold models for the genetic analysis of calving ease scores

In this study, a hierarchical threshold mixed model based on a cumulative t-link specification for the analysis of ordinal data or more, specifically, calving ease scores, was developed. The validation of this model and the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm was carried out on simulated data...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Genetics selection evolution (Paris) 2003-10, Vol.35 (5), p.489-512
Hauptverfasser: Kizilkaya, K, Carnier, P, Albera, A, Bittante, G, Tempelman, R J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In this study, a hierarchical threshold mixed model based on a cumulative t-link specification for the analysis of ordinal data or more, specifically, calving ease scores, was developed. The validation of this model and the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm was carried out on simulated data from normally and t sub(4) (i.e. a t-distribution with four degrees of freedom) distributed populations using the deviance information criterion (DIC) and a pseudo Bayes factor (PBF) measure to validate recently proposed model choice criteria. The simulation study indicated that although inference on the degrees of freedom parameter is possible, MCMC mixing was problematic. Nevertheless, the DIC and PBF were validated to be satisfactory measures of model fit to data. A sire and maternal grandsire cumulative t-link model was applied to a calving ease dataset from 8847 Italian Piemontese first parity dams. The cumulative t sub(4)-link model was shown to lead to posterior means of direct and maternal heritabilities (0.40 plus or minus 0.06, 0.11 plus or minus 0.04) and a direct maternal genetic correlation (-0.58 plus or minus 0.15) that were not different from the corresponding posterior means of the heritabilities (0.42 plus or minus 0.07, 0.14 plus or minus 0.04) and the genetic correlation (-0.55 plus or minus 0.14) inferred under the conventional cumulative probit link threshold model. Furthermore, the correlation (> 0.99) between posterior means of sire progeny merit from the two models suggested no meaningful rerankings. Nevertheless, the cumulative t-link model was decisively chosen as the better fitting model for this calving ease data using DIC and PBF.
ISSN:0999-193X
1297-9686
DOI:10.1051/gse:2003036