An Investigation of Failure Types in High-Strength Steel Resistance Spot Welds
On the shop floor, as in laboratories, destructive testing remains the main means of quality control of spot welds. After hand or mechanized weld destruction, the so-called “plug diameter” is measured and is usually considered a good indicator of the weld quality. However, it turns out that the “plu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Welding in the world 2010-03, Vol.54 (3-4), p.3-14 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | On the shop floor, as in laboratories, destructive testing remains the main means of quality control of spot welds. After hand or mechanized weld destruction, the so-called “plug diameter” is measured and is usually considered a good indicator of the weld quality. However, it turns out that the “plug” failure of spot welds is far from being the rule. Moreover, fracture may occur in different zones of the weld, leading to very different meanings of the plug diameter. Therefore, the plug diameter is most of the time not well-correlated with the weld strength, which is the main value of the spot weld. Partial or full interfacial failures (through the weld nugget) exhibit equivalent mechanical strengths and therefore should not be rejected. Through this work, it is shown that the failure type depends on various parameters (nugget diameter, sheet thickness, loading mode, …), and consequently, it is not an intrinsic property of the steel grade. In this way, recommended quality criteria are based on weld strength, weld diameter (including the interfacial fracture area if any), or absorbed energy independently of failure occurrence. In addition, non-destructive techniques might be key investigation methods and have to be developed further. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0043-2288 1878-6669 |
DOI: | 10.1007/BF03263485 |