Pesticide Risk Mitigation by Vegetated Treatment Systems: A Meta‐Analysis

Pesticides entering agricultural surface waters threaten water quality and aquatic communities. Recently, vegetated treatment systems (VTSs) (e.g., constructed wetlands and vegetated ditches) have been proposed as pesticide risk mitigation measures. However, little is known about the effectiveness o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of environmental quality 2011-07, Vol.40 (4), p.1068-1080
Hauptverfasser: Stehle, Sebastian, Elsaesser, David, Gregoire, Caroline, Imfeld, Gwenaël, Niehaus, Engelbert, Passeport, Elodie, Payraudeau, Sylvain, Schäfer, Ralf B., Tournebize, Julien, Schulz, Ralf
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1080
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1068
container_title Journal of environmental quality
container_volume 40
creator Stehle, Sebastian
Elsaesser, David
Gregoire, Caroline
Imfeld, Gwenaël
Niehaus, Engelbert
Passeport, Elodie
Payraudeau, Sylvain
Schäfer, Ralf B.
Tournebize, Julien
Schulz, Ralf
description Pesticides entering agricultural surface waters threaten water quality and aquatic communities. Recently, vegetated treatment systems (VTSs) (e.g., constructed wetlands and vegetated ditches) have been proposed as pesticide risk mitigation measures. However, little is known about the effectiveness of VTSs in controlling nonpoint source pesticide pollution and factors relevant for pesticide retention within these systems. Here, we conducted a meta‐analysis on pesticide mitigation by VTSs using data from the scientific literature and the European LIFE ArtWET project. Overall, VTSs effectively reduced pesticide exposure levels (i.e., the majority of pesticide retention performances was >70%). A multiple linear regression analysis of 188 retention performance cases identified the two pesticide properties, organic carbon sorption coefficient value and water‐phase 50% dissipation time, as well as the VTS characteristics overall plant coverage and hydraulic retention time for targeting high efficacy of pesticide retention. The application of a Tier I risk assessment (EU Uniform Principle) revealed a higher toxicity reduction for hydrophobic and nonpersistent insecticides compared with less sorptive and not readily degradable herbicides and fungicides. Overall, nearly half (48.5%) of all pesticide field concentrations (n = 130) failed Tier I standard risk assessment at the inlet of VTSs, and 29.2% of all outlet concentrations exceeded conservative acute threshold levels. We conclude that VTSs are a suitable and effective risk mitigation strategy for agricultural nonpoint source pesticide pollution of surface waters. Further research is needed to improve their overall efficacy in retaining pesticides.
doi_str_mv 10.2134/jeq2010.0510
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00765318v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2390764511</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4010-6288f7470bde6aff57c2ff424c701732d572c7a8d290885c7b79d312b6e116093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLtOwzAUhi0EoqWwMaOIDYmA7dixwxZVhQKtuBVWy0mc4pI0bZyCsvEIPCNPgkNKRwbfjj99OucH4BDBM4w8cj5TSwztA1IEt0AXUY-52G7boAshsXeCaQfsGTODEGHI_F3QwYghTBntgtt7ZSod60Q5j9q8OWNd6amsdDF3otp5UVNVyUolzqRUssrVvHKealOp3Fw4oTO2n9-fX-FcZrXRZh_spDIz6mB99sDz5WDSH7qju6vrfjhyY2IbdX3MecoIg1GifJmmlMU4TQkmMYOIeTihDMdM8gQHkHMas4gFiYdw5CuEfBh4PXDSel9lJhalzmVZi0JqMQxHoqlBOyX1EH9Hlj1u2UVZLFd2VjErVqVt2AjOCKfMZw102kJxWRhTqnRjRVA0IYt1yKIJ2eJHa-cqylWygf9StUDQAh86U_W_MnEzeMDNsoVf-Q-ww4Zw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>874857671</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pesticide Risk Mitigation by Vegetated Treatment Systems: A Meta‐Analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Full Collection</source><creator>Stehle, Sebastian ; Elsaesser, David ; Gregoire, Caroline ; Imfeld, Gwenaël ; Niehaus, Engelbert ; Passeport, Elodie ; Payraudeau, Sylvain ; Schäfer, Ralf B. ; Tournebize, Julien ; Schulz, Ralf</creator><creatorcontrib>Stehle, Sebastian ; Elsaesser, David ; Gregoire, Caroline ; Imfeld, Gwenaël ; Niehaus, Engelbert ; Passeport, Elodie ; Payraudeau, Sylvain ; Schäfer, Ralf B. ; Tournebize, Julien ; Schulz, Ralf</creatorcontrib><description>Pesticides entering agricultural surface waters threaten water quality and aquatic communities. Recently, vegetated treatment systems (VTSs) (e.g., constructed wetlands and vegetated ditches) have been proposed as pesticide risk mitigation measures. However, little is known about the effectiveness of VTSs in controlling nonpoint source pesticide pollution and factors relevant for pesticide retention within these systems. Here, we conducted a meta‐analysis on pesticide mitigation by VTSs using data from the scientific literature and the European LIFE ArtWET project. Overall, VTSs effectively reduced pesticide exposure levels (i.e., the majority of pesticide retention performances was &gt;70%). A multiple linear regression analysis of 188 retention performance cases identified the two pesticide properties, organic carbon sorption coefficient value and water‐phase 50% dissipation time, as well as the VTS characteristics overall plant coverage and hydraulic retention time for targeting high efficacy of pesticide retention. The application of a Tier I risk assessment (EU Uniform Principle) revealed a higher toxicity reduction for hydrophobic and nonpersistent insecticides compared with less sorptive and not readily degradable herbicides and fungicides. Overall, nearly half (48.5%) of all pesticide field concentrations (n = 130) failed Tier I standard risk assessment at the inlet of VTSs, and 29.2% of all outlet concentrations exceeded conservative acute threshold levels. We conclude that VTSs are a suitable and effective risk mitigation strategy for agricultural nonpoint source pesticide pollution of surface waters. Further research is needed to improve their overall efficacy in retaining pesticides.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2425</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2537</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/jeq2010.0510</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21712575</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEVQAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc</publisher><subject>Agrochemicals ; Artificial wetlands ; Ditches ; Earth Sciences ; Environmental Engineering ; Environmental impact ; Environmental management ; Environmental Restoration and Remediation - methods ; Environmental Sciences ; Fungicides ; Global Changes ; Herbicides ; Hydrology ; Insecticides ; Mitigation ; Nonpoint source pollution ; Organic carbon ; Pesticides ; Pesticides - chemistry ; Regression analysis ; Retention ; Retention time ; Risk Assessment ; Risk reduction ; Sciences of the Universe ; Studies ; Surface water ; Water Movements ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis ; Water Pollution - prevention &amp; control ; Water quality ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental quality, 2011-07, Vol.40 (4), p.1068-1080</ispartof><rights>Copyright © by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Jul/Aug 2011</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4010-6288f7470bde6aff57c2ff424c701732d572c7a8d290885c7b79d312b6e116093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4010-6288f7470bde6aff57c2ff424c701732d572c7a8d290885c7b79d312b6e116093</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7054-4666 ; 0000-0001-9294-839X ; 0000-0002-6348-6971 ; 0000-0003-2546-7857</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2134%2Fjeq2010.0510$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2134%2Fjeq2010.0510$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21712575$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-00765318$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stehle, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elsaesser, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregoire, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imfeld, Gwenaël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niehaus, Engelbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Passeport, Elodie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payraudeau, Sylvain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schäfer, Ralf B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tournebize, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulz, Ralf</creatorcontrib><title>Pesticide Risk Mitigation by Vegetated Treatment Systems: A Meta‐Analysis</title><title>Journal of environmental quality</title><addtitle>J Environ Qual</addtitle><description>Pesticides entering agricultural surface waters threaten water quality and aquatic communities. Recently, vegetated treatment systems (VTSs) (e.g., constructed wetlands and vegetated ditches) have been proposed as pesticide risk mitigation measures. However, little is known about the effectiveness of VTSs in controlling nonpoint source pesticide pollution and factors relevant for pesticide retention within these systems. Here, we conducted a meta‐analysis on pesticide mitigation by VTSs using data from the scientific literature and the European LIFE ArtWET project. Overall, VTSs effectively reduced pesticide exposure levels (i.e., the majority of pesticide retention performances was &gt;70%). A multiple linear regression analysis of 188 retention performance cases identified the two pesticide properties, organic carbon sorption coefficient value and water‐phase 50% dissipation time, as well as the VTS characteristics overall plant coverage and hydraulic retention time for targeting high efficacy of pesticide retention. The application of a Tier I risk assessment (EU Uniform Principle) revealed a higher toxicity reduction for hydrophobic and nonpersistent insecticides compared with less sorptive and not readily degradable herbicides and fungicides. Overall, nearly half (48.5%) of all pesticide field concentrations (n = 130) failed Tier I standard risk assessment at the inlet of VTSs, and 29.2% of all outlet concentrations exceeded conservative acute threshold levels. We conclude that VTSs are a suitable and effective risk mitigation strategy for agricultural nonpoint source pesticide pollution of surface waters. Further research is needed to improve their overall efficacy in retaining pesticides.</description><subject>Agrochemicals</subject><subject>Artificial wetlands</subject><subject>Ditches</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental Engineering</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Environmental Restoration and Remediation - methods</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Fungicides</subject><subject>Global Changes</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>Mitigation</subject><subject>Nonpoint source pollution</subject><subject>Organic carbon</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Pesticides - chemistry</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Retention time</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk reduction</subject><subject>Sciences of the Universe</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>Water Movements</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><subject>Water Pollution - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>0047-2425</issn><issn>1537-2537</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kLtOwzAUhi0EoqWwMaOIDYmA7dixwxZVhQKtuBVWy0mc4pI0bZyCsvEIPCNPgkNKRwbfjj99OucH4BDBM4w8cj5TSwztA1IEt0AXUY-52G7boAshsXeCaQfsGTODEGHI_F3QwYghTBntgtt7ZSod60Q5j9q8OWNd6amsdDF3otp5UVNVyUolzqRUssrVvHKealOp3Fw4oTO2n9-fX-FcZrXRZh_spDIz6mB99sDz5WDSH7qju6vrfjhyY2IbdX3MecoIg1GifJmmlMU4TQkmMYOIeTihDMdM8gQHkHMas4gFiYdw5CuEfBh4PXDSel9lJhalzmVZi0JqMQxHoqlBOyX1EH9Hlj1u2UVZLFd2VjErVqVt2AjOCKfMZw102kJxWRhTqnRjRVA0IYt1yKIJ2eJHa-cqylWygf9StUDQAh86U_W_MnEzeMDNsoVf-Q-ww4Zw</recordid><startdate>201107</startdate><enddate>201107</enddate><creator>Stehle, Sebastian</creator><creator>Elsaesser, David</creator><creator>Gregoire, Caroline</creator><creator>Imfeld, Gwenaël</creator><creator>Niehaus, Engelbert</creator><creator>Passeport, Elodie</creator><creator>Payraudeau, Sylvain</creator><creator>Schäfer, Ralf B.</creator><creator>Tournebize, Julien</creator><creator>Schulz, Ralf</creator><general>The American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><general>Crop Science Society of America</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7054-4666</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9294-839X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6348-6971</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2546-7857</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201107</creationdate><title>Pesticide Risk Mitigation by Vegetated Treatment Systems: A Meta‐Analysis</title><author>Stehle, Sebastian ; Elsaesser, David ; Gregoire, Caroline ; Imfeld, Gwenaël ; Niehaus, Engelbert ; Passeport, Elodie ; Payraudeau, Sylvain ; Schäfer, Ralf B. ; Tournebize, Julien ; Schulz, Ralf</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4010-6288f7470bde6aff57c2ff424c701732d572c7a8d290885c7b79d312b6e116093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Agrochemicals</topic><topic>Artificial wetlands</topic><topic>Ditches</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental Engineering</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Environmental Restoration and Remediation - methods</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Fungicides</topic><topic>Global Changes</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>Mitigation</topic><topic>Nonpoint source pollution</topic><topic>Organic carbon</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Pesticides - chemistry</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Retention time</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk reduction</topic><topic>Sciences of the Universe</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>Water Movements</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</topic><topic>Water Pollution - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stehle, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elsaesser, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregoire, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imfeld, Gwenaël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niehaus, Engelbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Passeport, Elodie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payraudeau, Sylvain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schäfer, Ralf B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tournebize, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulz, Ralf</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stehle, Sebastian</au><au>Elsaesser, David</au><au>Gregoire, Caroline</au><au>Imfeld, Gwenaël</au><au>Niehaus, Engelbert</au><au>Passeport, Elodie</au><au>Payraudeau, Sylvain</au><au>Schäfer, Ralf B.</au><au>Tournebize, Julien</au><au>Schulz, Ralf</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pesticide Risk Mitigation by Vegetated Treatment Systems: A Meta‐Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Qual</addtitle><date>2011-07</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1068</spage><epage>1080</epage><pages>1068-1080</pages><issn>0047-2425</issn><eissn>1537-2537</eissn><coden>JEVQAA</coden><abstract>Pesticides entering agricultural surface waters threaten water quality and aquatic communities. Recently, vegetated treatment systems (VTSs) (e.g., constructed wetlands and vegetated ditches) have been proposed as pesticide risk mitigation measures. However, little is known about the effectiveness of VTSs in controlling nonpoint source pesticide pollution and factors relevant for pesticide retention within these systems. Here, we conducted a meta‐analysis on pesticide mitigation by VTSs using data from the scientific literature and the European LIFE ArtWET project. Overall, VTSs effectively reduced pesticide exposure levels (i.e., the majority of pesticide retention performances was &gt;70%). A multiple linear regression analysis of 188 retention performance cases identified the two pesticide properties, organic carbon sorption coefficient value and water‐phase 50% dissipation time, as well as the VTS characteristics overall plant coverage and hydraulic retention time for targeting high efficacy of pesticide retention. The application of a Tier I risk assessment (EU Uniform Principle) revealed a higher toxicity reduction for hydrophobic and nonpersistent insecticides compared with less sorptive and not readily degradable herbicides and fungicides. Overall, nearly half (48.5%) of all pesticide field concentrations (n = 130) failed Tier I standard risk assessment at the inlet of VTSs, and 29.2% of all outlet concentrations exceeded conservative acute threshold levels. We conclude that VTSs are a suitable and effective risk mitigation strategy for agricultural nonpoint source pesticide pollution of surface waters. Further research is needed to improve their overall efficacy in retaining pesticides.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc</pub><pmid>21712575</pmid><doi>10.2134/jeq2010.0510</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7054-4666</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9294-839X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6348-6971</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2546-7857</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0047-2425
ispartof Journal of environmental quality, 2011-07, Vol.40 (4), p.1068-1080
issn 0047-2425
1537-2537
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00765318v1
source MEDLINE; Wiley-Blackwell Full Collection
subjects Agrochemicals
Artificial wetlands
Ditches
Earth Sciences
Environmental Engineering
Environmental impact
Environmental management
Environmental Restoration and Remediation - methods
Environmental Sciences
Fungicides
Global Changes
Herbicides
Hydrology
Insecticides
Mitigation
Nonpoint source pollution
Organic carbon
Pesticides
Pesticides - chemistry
Regression analysis
Retention
Retention time
Risk Assessment
Risk reduction
Sciences of the Universe
Studies
Surface water
Water Movements
Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis
Water Pollution - prevention & control
Water quality
Wetlands
title Pesticide Risk Mitigation by Vegetated Treatment Systems: A Meta‐Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T18%3A28%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pesticide%20Risk%20Mitigation%20by%20Vegetated%20Treatment%20Systems:%20A%20Meta%E2%80%90Analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20quality&rft.au=Stehle,%20Sebastian&rft.date=2011-07&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1068&rft.epage=1080&rft.pages=1068-1080&rft.issn=0047-2425&rft.eissn=1537-2537&rft.coden=JEVQAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/jeq2010.0510&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2390764511%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=874857671&rft_id=info:pmid/21712575&rfr_iscdi=true