Pesticide Risk Mitigation by Vegetated Treatment Systems: A Meta‐Analysis
Pesticides entering agricultural surface waters threaten water quality and aquatic communities. Recently, vegetated treatment systems (VTSs) (e.g., constructed wetlands and vegetated ditches) have been proposed as pesticide risk mitigation measures. However, little is known about the effectiveness o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of environmental quality 2011-07, Vol.40 (4), p.1068-1080 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1080 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1068 |
container_title | Journal of environmental quality |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Stehle, Sebastian Elsaesser, David Gregoire, Caroline Imfeld, Gwenaël Niehaus, Engelbert Passeport, Elodie Payraudeau, Sylvain Schäfer, Ralf B. Tournebize, Julien Schulz, Ralf |
description | Pesticides entering agricultural surface waters threaten water quality and aquatic communities. Recently, vegetated treatment systems (VTSs) (e.g., constructed wetlands and vegetated ditches) have been proposed as pesticide risk mitigation measures. However, little is known about the effectiveness of VTSs in controlling nonpoint source pesticide pollution and factors relevant for pesticide retention within these systems. Here, we conducted a meta‐analysis on pesticide mitigation by VTSs using data from the scientific literature and the European LIFE ArtWET project. Overall, VTSs effectively reduced pesticide exposure levels (i.e., the majority of pesticide retention performances was >70%). A multiple linear regression analysis of 188 retention performance cases identified the two pesticide properties, organic carbon sorption coefficient value and water‐phase 50% dissipation time, as well as the VTS characteristics overall plant coverage and hydraulic retention time for targeting high efficacy of pesticide retention. The application of a Tier I risk assessment (EU Uniform Principle) revealed a higher toxicity reduction for hydrophobic and nonpersistent insecticides compared with less sorptive and not readily degradable herbicides and fungicides. Overall, nearly half (48.5%) of all pesticide field concentrations (n = 130) failed Tier I standard risk assessment at the inlet of VTSs, and 29.2% of all outlet concentrations exceeded conservative acute threshold levels. We conclude that VTSs are a suitable and effective risk mitigation strategy for agricultural nonpoint source pesticide pollution of surface waters. Further research is needed to improve their overall efficacy in retaining pesticides. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2134/jeq2010.0510 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00765318v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2390764511</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4010-6288f7470bde6aff57c2ff424c701732d572c7a8d290885c7b79d312b6e116093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLtOwzAUhi0EoqWwMaOIDYmA7dixwxZVhQKtuBVWy0mc4pI0bZyCsvEIPCNPgkNKRwbfjj99OucH4BDBM4w8cj5TSwztA1IEt0AXUY-52G7boAshsXeCaQfsGTODEGHI_F3QwYghTBntgtt7ZSod60Q5j9q8OWNd6amsdDF3otp5UVNVyUolzqRUssrVvHKealOp3Fw4oTO2n9-fX-FcZrXRZh_spDIz6mB99sDz5WDSH7qju6vrfjhyY2IbdX3MecoIg1GifJmmlMU4TQkmMYOIeTihDMdM8gQHkHMas4gFiYdw5CuEfBh4PXDSel9lJhalzmVZi0JqMQxHoqlBOyX1EH9Hlj1u2UVZLFd2VjErVqVt2AjOCKfMZw102kJxWRhTqnRjRVA0IYt1yKIJ2eJHa-cqylWygf9StUDQAh86U_W_MnEzeMDNsoVf-Q-ww4Zw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>874857671</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pesticide Risk Mitigation by Vegetated Treatment Systems: A Meta‐Analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Full Collection</source><creator>Stehle, Sebastian ; Elsaesser, David ; Gregoire, Caroline ; Imfeld, Gwenaël ; Niehaus, Engelbert ; Passeport, Elodie ; Payraudeau, Sylvain ; Schäfer, Ralf B. ; Tournebize, Julien ; Schulz, Ralf</creator><creatorcontrib>Stehle, Sebastian ; Elsaesser, David ; Gregoire, Caroline ; Imfeld, Gwenaël ; Niehaus, Engelbert ; Passeport, Elodie ; Payraudeau, Sylvain ; Schäfer, Ralf B. ; Tournebize, Julien ; Schulz, Ralf</creatorcontrib><description>Pesticides entering agricultural surface waters threaten water quality and aquatic communities. Recently, vegetated treatment systems (VTSs) (e.g., constructed wetlands and vegetated ditches) have been proposed as pesticide risk mitigation measures. However, little is known about the effectiveness of VTSs in controlling nonpoint source pesticide pollution and factors relevant for pesticide retention within these systems. Here, we conducted a meta‐analysis on pesticide mitigation by VTSs using data from the scientific literature and the European LIFE ArtWET project. Overall, VTSs effectively reduced pesticide exposure levels (i.e., the majority of pesticide retention performances was >70%). A multiple linear regression analysis of 188 retention performance cases identified the two pesticide properties, organic carbon sorption coefficient value and water‐phase 50% dissipation time, as well as the VTS characteristics overall plant coverage and hydraulic retention time for targeting high efficacy of pesticide retention. The application of a Tier I risk assessment (EU Uniform Principle) revealed a higher toxicity reduction for hydrophobic and nonpersistent insecticides compared with less sorptive and not readily degradable herbicides and fungicides. Overall, nearly half (48.5%) of all pesticide field concentrations (n = 130) failed Tier I standard risk assessment at the inlet of VTSs, and 29.2% of all outlet concentrations exceeded conservative acute threshold levels. We conclude that VTSs are a suitable and effective risk mitigation strategy for agricultural nonpoint source pesticide pollution of surface waters. Further research is needed to improve their overall efficacy in retaining pesticides.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2425</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2537</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/jeq2010.0510</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21712575</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEVQAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc</publisher><subject>Agrochemicals ; Artificial wetlands ; Ditches ; Earth Sciences ; Environmental Engineering ; Environmental impact ; Environmental management ; Environmental Restoration and Remediation - methods ; Environmental Sciences ; Fungicides ; Global Changes ; Herbicides ; Hydrology ; Insecticides ; Mitigation ; Nonpoint source pollution ; Organic carbon ; Pesticides ; Pesticides - chemistry ; Regression analysis ; Retention ; Retention time ; Risk Assessment ; Risk reduction ; Sciences of the Universe ; Studies ; Surface water ; Water Movements ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis ; Water Pollution - prevention & control ; Water quality ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental quality, 2011-07, Vol.40 (4), p.1068-1080</ispartof><rights>Copyright © by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Jul/Aug 2011</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4010-6288f7470bde6aff57c2ff424c701732d572c7a8d290885c7b79d312b6e116093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4010-6288f7470bde6aff57c2ff424c701732d572c7a8d290885c7b79d312b6e116093</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7054-4666 ; 0000-0001-9294-839X ; 0000-0002-6348-6971 ; 0000-0003-2546-7857</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2134%2Fjeq2010.0510$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2134%2Fjeq2010.0510$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21712575$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-00765318$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stehle, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elsaesser, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregoire, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imfeld, Gwenaël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niehaus, Engelbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Passeport, Elodie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payraudeau, Sylvain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schäfer, Ralf B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tournebize, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulz, Ralf</creatorcontrib><title>Pesticide Risk Mitigation by Vegetated Treatment Systems: A Meta‐Analysis</title><title>Journal of environmental quality</title><addtitle>J Environ Qual</addtitle><description>Pesticides entering agricultural surface waters threaten water quality and aquatic communities. Recently, vegetated treatment systems (VTSs) (e.g., constructed wetlands and vegetated ditches) have been proposed as pesticide risk mitigation measures. However, little is known about the effectiveness of VTSs in controlling nonpoint source pesticide pollution and factors relevant for pesticide retention within these systems. Here, we conducted a meta‐analysis on pesticide mitigation by VTSs using data from the scientific literature and the European LIFE ArtWET project. Overall, VTSs effectively reduced pesticide exposure levels (i.e., the majority of pesticide retention performances was >70%). A multiple linear regression analysis of 188 retention performance cases identified the two pesticide properties, organic carbon sorption coefficient value and water‐phase 50% dissipation time, as well as the VTS characteristics overall plant coverage and hydraulic retention time for targeting high efficacy of pesticide retention. The application of a Tier I risk assessment (EU Uniform Principle) revealed a higher toxicity reduction for hydrophobic and nonpersistent insecticides compared with less sorptive and not readily degradable herbicides and fungicides. Overall, nearly half (48.5%) of all pesticide field concentrations (n = 130) failed Tier I standard risk assessment at the inlet of VTSs, and 29.2% of all outlet concentrations exceeded conservative acute threshold levels. We conclude that VTSs are a suitable and effective risk mitigation strategy for agricultural nonpoint source pesticide pollution of surface waters. Further research is needed to improve their overall efficacy in retaining pesticides.</description><subject>Agrochemicals</subject><subject>Artificial wetlands</subject><subject>Ditches</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental Engineering</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Environmental Restoration and Remediation - methods</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Fungicides</subject><subject>Global Changes</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>Mitigation</subject><subject>Nonpoint source pollution</subject><subject>Organic carbon</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Pesticides - chemistry</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Retention time</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk reduction</subject><subject>Sciences of the Universe</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>Water Movements</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><subject>Water Pollution - prevention & control</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>0047-2425</issn><issn>1537-2537</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kLtOwzAUhi0EoqWwMaOIDYmA7dixwxZVhQKtuBVWy0mc4pI0bZyCsvEIPCNPgkNKRwbfjj99OucH4BDBM4w8cj5TSwztA1IEt0AXUY-52G7boAshsXeCaQfsGTODEGHI_F3QwYghTBntgtt7ZSod60Q5j9q8OWNd6amsdDF3otp5UVNVyUolzqRUssrVvHKealOp3Fw4oTO2n9-fX-FcZrXRZh_spDIz6mB99sDz5WDSH7qju6vrfjhyY2IbdX3MecoIg1GifJmmlMU4TQkmMYOIeTihDMdM8gQHkHMas4gFiYdw5CuEfBh4PXDSel9lJhalzmVZi0JqMQxHoqlBOyX1EH9Hlj1u2UVZLFd2VjErVqVt2AjOCKfMZw102kJxWRhTqnRjRVA0IYt1yKIJ2eJHa-cqylWygf9StUDQAh86U_W_MnEzeMDNsoVf-Q-ww4Zw</recordid><startdate>201107</startdate><enddate>201107</enddate><creator>Stehle, Sebastian</creator><creator>Elsaesser, David</creator><creator>Gregoire, Caroline</creator><creator>Imfeld, Gwenaël</creator><creator>Niehaus, Engelbert</creator><creator>Passeport, Elodie</creator><creator>Payraudeau, Sylvain</creator><creator>Schäfer, Ralf B.</creator><creator>Tournebize, Julien</creator><creator>Schulz, Ralf</creator><general>The American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><general>Crop Science Society of America</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7054-4666</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9294-839X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6348-6971</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2546-7857</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201107</creationdate><title>Pesticide Risk Mitigation by Vegetated Treatment Systems: A Meta‐Analysis</title><author>Stehle, Sebastian ; Elsaesser, David ; Gregoire, Caroline ; Imfeld, Gwenaël ; Niehaus, Engelbert ; Passeport, Elodie ; Payraudeau, Sylvain ; Schäfer, Ralf B. ; Tournebize, Julien ; Schulz, Ralf</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4010-6288f7470bde6aff57c2ff424c701732d572c7a8d290885c7b79d312b6e116093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Agrochemicals</topic><topic>Artificial wetlands</topic><topic>Ditches</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental Engineering</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Environmental Restoration and Remediation - methods</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Fungicides</topic><topic>Global Changes</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>Mitigation</topic><topic>Nonpoint source pollution</topic><topic>Organic carbon</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Pesticides - chemistry</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Retention time</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk reduction</topic><topic>Sciences of the Universe</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>Water Movements</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</topic><topic>Water Pollution - prevention & control</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stehle, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elsaesser, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregoire, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imfeld, Gwenaël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niehaus, Engelbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Passeport, Elodie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payraudeau, Sylvain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schäfer, Ralf B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tournebize, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulz, Ralf</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stehle, Sebastian</au><au>Elsaesser, David</au><au>Gregoire, Caroline</au><au>Imfeld, Gwenaël</au><au>Niehaus, Engelbert</au><au>Passeport, Elodie</au><au>Payraudeau, Sylvain</au><au>Schäfer, Ralf B.</au><au>Tournebize, Julien</au><au>Schulz, Ralf</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pesticide Risk Mitigation by Vegetated Treatment Systems: A Meta‐Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Qual</addtitle><date>2011-07</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1068</spage><epage>1080</epage><pages>1068-1080</pages><issn>0047-2425</issn><eissn>1537-2537</eissn><coden>JEVQAA</coden><abstract>Pesticides entering agricultural surface waters threaten water quality and aquatic communities. Recently, vegetated treatment systems (VTSs) (e.g., constructed wetlands and vegetated ditches) have been proposed as pesticide risk mitigation measures. However, little is known about the effectiveness of VTSs in controlling nonpoint source pesticide pollution and factors relevant for pesticide retention within these systems. Here, we conducted a meta‐analysis on pesticide mitigation by VTSs using data from the scientific literature and the European LIFE ArtWET project. Overall, VTSs effectively reduced pesticide exposure levels (i.e., the majority of pesticide retention performances was >70%). A multiple linear regression analysis of 188 retention performance cases identified the two pesticide properties, organic carbon sorption coefficient value and water‐phase 50% dissipation time, as well as the VTS characteristics overall plant coverage and hydraulic retention time for targeting high efficacy of pesticide retention. The application of a Tier I risk assessment (EU Uniform Principle) revealed a higher toxicity reduction for hydrophobic and nonpersistent insecticides compared with less sorptive and not readily degradable herbicides and fungicides. Overall, nearly half (48.5%) of all pesticide field concentrations (n = 130) failed Tier I standard risk assessment at the inlet of VTSs, and 29.2% of all outlet concentrations exceeded conservative acute threshold levels. We conclude that VTSs are a suitable and effective risk mitigation strategy for agricultural nonpoint source pesticide pollution of surface waters. Further research is needed to improve their overall efficacy in retaining pesticides.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc</pub><pmid>21712575</pmid><doi>10.2134/jeq2010.0510</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7054-4666</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9294-839X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6348-6971</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2546-7857</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0047-2425 |
ispartof | Journal of environmental quality, 2011-07, Vol.40 (4), p.1068-1080 |
issn | 0047-2425 1537-2537 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00765318v1 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley-Blackwell Full Collection |
subjects | Agrochemicals Artificial wetlands Ditches Earth Sciences Environmental Engineering Environmental impact Environmental management Environmental Restoration and Remediation - methods Environmental Sciences Fungicides Global Changes Herbicides Hydrology Insecticides Mitigation Nonpoint source pollution Organic carbon Pesticides Pesticides - chemistry Regression analysis Retention Retention time Risk Assessment Risk reduction Sciences of the Universe Studies Surface water Water Movements Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis Water Pollution - prevention & control Water quality Wetlands |
title | Pesticide Risk Mitigation by Vegetated Treatment Systems: A Meta‐Analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T18%3A28%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pesticide%20Risk%20Mitigation%20by%20Vegetated%20Treatment%20Systems:%20A%20Meta%E2%80%90Analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20quality&rft.au=Stehle,%20Sebastian&rft.date=2011-07&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1068&rft.epage=1080&rft.pages=1068-1080&rft.issn=0047-2425&rft.eissn=1537-2537&rft.coden=JEVQAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/jeq2010.0510&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2390764511%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=874857671&rft_id=info:pmid/21712575&rfr_iscdi=true |