Complexity selection of a neural network model for karst flood forecasting: The case of the Lez Basin (southern France)
► Forecasting flash flood of a karst aquifer in Mediterranean context is carried out. ► Complexity selection method deriving a parsimonious neural network is proposed. ► Outflow forecasting one day ahead is performed without rainfall assumption. ► The neural model is able to extrapolate on the most...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam) 2011-06, Vol.403 (3), p.367-380 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | ► Forecasting flash flood of a karst aquifer in Mediterranean context is carried out. ► Complexity selection method deriving a parsimonious neural network is proposed. ► Outflow forecasting one day ahead is performed without rainfall assumption. ► The neural model is able to extrapolate on the most intense event of the database.
A neural network model is applied to simulate the rainfall-runoff relation of a karst spring. The input selection for such a model becomes a major issue when deriving a parsimonious and efficient model. The present study is focused on these input selection methods; it begins by proposing two such methods and combines them in a subsequent step. The methods introduced are assessed for both simulation and forecasting purposes. Since rainfall is very difficult to forecast, especially in the study area, we have chosen a forecasting mode that does not require any rainfall forecast assumptions. This application has been implemented on the
Lez karst aquifer, a highly complex basin due to its structure and operating conditions. Our models yield very good results, and the forecasted discharge values at the
Lez spring are acceptable up to a 1-day forecasting horizon. The combined input selection method ultimately proves to be promising, by reducing input selection time while taking into account: (i) the model’s ability to accommodate nonlinearity and (ii) the forecasting horizon. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-1694 1879-2707 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.04.015 |