Comparative study on Charpy specimen reconstitution techniques

► Welding processes are used to reconstitute previously tested Charpy specimens. ► Stud welding is preferred for a quick installation, almost immediately operational. ► Friction welding produces better quality welds, but requires a development effort. Reconstitution techniques are often used to allo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nuclear engineering and design 2011-08, Vol.241 (8), p.2722-2731
Hauptverfasser: Bourdiliau, B., Decroix, G.-M., Averty, X., Wident, P., Bienvenu, Y.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:► Welding processes are used to reconstitute previously tested Charpy specimens. ► Stud welding is preferred for a quick installation, almost immediately operational. ► Friction welding produces better quality welds, but requires a development effort. Reconstitution techniques are often used to allow material from previously fractured Charpy-V specimens to be reused for additional experiments. This paper presents a comparative experimental study of various reconstitution techniques and evaluates the feasibility of these methods for future use in shielded cells. The following techniques were investigated: arc stud welding, 6.0 kW CO 2 continuous wave laser welding, 4.5 kW YAG continuous wave laser welding and friction welding. Subsize Charpy specimens were reconstituted using a 400 W YAG pulsed wave laser. The best result was obtained with arc stud welding; the resilience of the reconstituted specimens and the load–displacement curves agreed well with the reference specimens, and the temperature elevation caused by the welding process was limited to the vicinity of the weld. Good results were also obtained with friction welding; this process led to the best quality welds. Laser welding seems to have affected the central part of the specimens, thus leading to different resilience values and load–displacement curves.
ISSN:0029-5493
1872-759X
DOI:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.06.012