Management of Patients with Head and Neck Tumours Presenting at Diagnosis with a Synchronous Second Cancer at Another Anatomic Site

Abstract Aims To understand management strategies and outcomes of patients diagnosed with a head and neck tumour and a synchronous second cancer developed at another anatomic site. Materials and methods Retrospective analysis of all patients diagnosed with a head and neck carcinoma and a synchronous...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)) 2011-04, Vol.23 (3), p.174-181
Hauptverfasser: Graff, P, Schipman, B, Desandes, E, Mecellem, H, Toussaint, B, Cortese, S, Marchal, F, Kaminsky, M.C, Geoffrois, L, Peiffert, D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Aims To understand management strategies and outcomes of patients diagnosed with a head and neck tumour and a synchronous second cancer developed at another anatomic site. Materials and methods Retrospective analysis of all patients diagnosed with a head and neck carcinoma and a synchronous cancer and engaged in curative-intent treatments. To evaluate therapeutic strategies, each patient’s treatment process was divided into sequential therapeutic modalities and corresponding targets (head and neck and/or synchronous tumour) were identified. Patient outcome was analysed with an intent-to-treat approach. Results : Forty-three patients were entered into the study (mean age = 57.4 years). Synchronous tumours concerned the lung (57.8%), oesophagus (31.1%) or other sites (11.1%). Treatments were complex, including one to four consecutive modalities, with a mean duration of 4.6 months. When both tumours were advanced, treatments were frequently initiated with dual-spectrum chemotherapy (66.7%). In other situations, a locoregional treatment was often (81.1%) proposed immediately. When both tumours were in early stages, this initial locoregional treatment could be extended to target both tumours together (30.0%). For patients whose tumours differed in severity, this locoregional treatment targeted only one tumour (85%); priority was given to the most advanced one (76.5%). Nine patients had definitive treatment interruption. Associated risk factors were a low body mass index ( P = 0.03) and advanced-stage tumours ( P = 0.01). Thirty-one patients died (72.1%) with a median time to death of 7.7 months. The median follow-up for survivors was 46.2 months. Three-year overall survival was 33.9%. Low body mass index ( P = 0.001), advanced-stage synchronous tumours ( P = 0.03) and oesophageal primaries ( P = 0.03) altered the overall survival. Three-year locoregional and metastatic progression-free survival was 40.8 and 62.5%, respectively. Low body mass index ( P = 0.01) and advanced-stage synchronous tumours ( P = 0.01) increased the risk of disease failure. Conclusions Head and neck tumours diagnosed with a synchronous cancer are a complex challenge. Despite a severe prognosis, patients who are not underweight, presenting with lower-stage tumours (especially the synchronous tumour) and without oesophageal involvement could most benefit from aggressive treatments.
ISSN:0936-6555
1433-2981
DOI:10.1016/j.clon.2010.10.008