Sociodemographic differences in return to work after stroke: the South London Stroke Register (SLSR)

Background:Loss of employment contributes significantly to the burden of stroke on individuals and society. There is limited information on factors influencing return to work after stroke.Objectives:To investigate the frequency and determinants of return to paid work after stroke in a multi-ethnic u...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry neurosurgery and psychiatry, 2009-08, Vol.80 (8), p.888-893
Hauptverfasser: Busch, M A, Coshall, C, Heuschmann, P U, McKevitt, C, Wolfe, C D A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background:Loss of employment contributes significantly to the burden of stroke on individuals and society. There is limited information on factors influencing return to work after stroke.Objectives:To investigate the frequency and determinants of return to paid work after stroke in a multi-ethnic urban population.Methods:Patterns of return to work were examined among people with first ever stroke registered in the population based South London Stroke Register. Employment status and functional outcome (Barthel Index (BI), Frenchay Activity Index (FAI)) were assessed 1 year after stroke. Associations between baseline characteristics and return to paid work were analysed by multivariable logistic regression analysis.Results:Among 2874 patients with first ever strokes in 1995–2004, 400 (15%) were working before the stroke. At 1 year, 94 (35%) of 266 survivors had returned to paid work. Black ethnicity (OR 0.41; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.88), female sex (0.43; 0.21 to 0.91), older age (p30/45) individuals had not resumed work.Conclusions:There were important sociodemographic differences in return to work after stroke that were independent of clinical and service use variables included in the analysis. A large proportion of patients did not resume work despite excellent functional outcome.
ISSN:0022-3050
1468-330X
DOI:10.1136/jnnp.2008.163295