M2B5 or M2B4? A Reinvestigation of the Mo/B and W/B System

The literature states different compositions (M/B = 1:2 vs. 2:5) and structures for diborides of molybdenum and tungsten. Using X‐ray and neutron powder diffraction as well as energy and wavelength dispersive electron microprobe analysis, the Mo/B and W/B systems were now reinvestigated. Molybdenum...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Zeitschrift für anorganische und allgemeine Chemie (1950) 2007-11, Vol.633 (15), p.2626-2630
Hauptverfasser: Frotscher, Michael, Klein, Wilhelm, Bauer, Joseph, Fang, Chang-Ming, Halet, Jean-Franois, Senyshyn, Anatoliy, Baehtz, Carsten, Albert, Barbara
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The literature states different compositions (M/B = 1:2 vs. 2:5) and structures for diborides of molybdenum and tungsten. Using X‐ray and neutron powder diffraction as well as energy and wavelength dispersive electron microprobe analysis, the Mo/B and W/B systems were now reinvestigated. Molybdenum diboride crystallizes as a stoichiometric compound Mo2B4 (formerly described as Mo2B5) in space group $R{\bar 3}m$ (No. 166, a, b = 3.01375(2) Å, c = 20.9541(3) Å), and as a non‐stoichiometric compound MoB2−x (formerly described as MoB2) in P6/mmm (No. 191, a, b = 3.043(2) Å, c = 3.067(2) Å), whereas stoichiometric tungsten diboride W2B4 (formerly described as W2B5) is found to crystallize in space group P63/mmc (No. 194, a, b = 2.9864(4) Å, c = 13.896(2) Å). These results seem to be supported by DFT calculations which show the instability of a hypothetic W2B5.
ISSN:0044-2313
1521-3749
DOI:10.1002/zaac.200700376