Identification of a bipartite focal adhesion localization signal in RhoU/Wrch-1, a Rho family GTPase that regulates cell adhesion and migration

Background information. Rho GTPases are important regulators of cytoskeleton dynamics and cell adhesion. RhoU/Wrch‐1 is a Rho GTPase which shares sequence similarities with Rac1 and Cdc42 (cell division cycle 42), but has also extended N‐ and C‐terminal domains. The N‐terminal extension promotes bin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biology of the cell 2007-12, Vol.99 (12), p.701-716
Hauptverfasser: Ory, Stéphane, Brazier, Hélène, Blangy, Anne
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background information. Rho GTPases are important regulators of cytoskeleton dynamics and cell adhesion. RhoU/Wrch‐1 is a Rho GTPase which shares sequence similarities with Rac1 and Cdc42 (cell division cycle 42), but has also extended N‐ and C‐terminal domains. The N‐terminal extension promotes binding to SH3 (Src homology 3)‐domain‐containing adaptors, whereas the C‐terminal extension mediates membrane targeting through palmitoylation of its non‐conventional CAAX box. RhoU/Wrch‐1 possesses transforming activity, which is negatively regulated by its N‐terminal extension and depends on palmitoylation. Results. In the present study, we have shown that RhoU is localized to podosomes in osteoclasts and c‐Src‐expressing cells, and to focal adhesions of HeLa cells and fibroblasts. The N‐terminal extension and the palmitoylation site were dispensable, whereas the C‐terminal extension and effector binding loop were critical for RhoU targeting to focal adhesions. Moreover, the number of focal adhesions was reduced and their distribution changed upon expression of activated RhoU. Conversely, RhoU silencing increased the number of focal adhesions. As RhoU was only transiently associated with adhesion structures, this suggests that RhoU may modify adhesion turnover and cell migration rate. Indeed, we found that migration distances were increased in cells expressing activated RhoU and decreased when RhoU was knocked‐down. Conclusions. Our data indicate that RhoU localizes to adhesion structures, regulates their number and distribution and increases cell motility. It also suggests that the RhoU effector binding and C‐terminal domains are critical for these functions.
ISSN:0248-4900
1768-322X
DOI:10.1042/BC20070058