Self-motion and the perception of stationary objects

One of the ways that we perceive shape is through seeing motion 1 , 2 , 3 . Visual motion may be actively generated (for example, in locomotion), or passively observed. In the study of the perception of three-dimensional structure from motion, the non-moving, passive observer in an environment of moving rigid objects has been used as a substitute 1 for an active observer moving in an environment of stationary objects; this ‘rigidity hypothesis’ has played a central role in computational and experimental studies of structure from motion 4 , 5 . Here we show that this is not an adequate substitution because active and passive observers can perceive three-dimensional structure differently, despite experiencing the same visual stimulus: active observers' perception of three-dimensional structure depends on extraretinal information about their own movements. The visual system thus treats objects that are stationary (in an allocentric, earth-fixed reference frame) differently from objects that are merely rigid. These results show that action makes an important contribution to depth perception, and argue for a revision of the rigidity hypothesis to incorporate the special case of stationary objects.