Comparative assessment of diagnostic accuracy: Helicobacter pylori stool antigen test versus rapid urease test in adult patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms
Background and aim Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is the leading cause of human stomach infections. Accurate diagnosis is ucial for the effective management of H. pylori, leading to the eation of numerous diagnostic techniques, including both invasive and noninvasive methods. Methods This study tho...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Al-Azhar Assiut medical Journal : AAMJ 2024-04, Vol.22 (2), p.110-117 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background and aim Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is the leading cause of human stomach infections. Accurate diagnosis is ucial for the effective management of H. pylori, leading to the eation of numerous diagnostic techniques, including both invasive and noninvasive methods. Methods This study thoroughly examines the diagnostic accuracy of the H. pylori Stool Antigen (HpSA) test in comparison to the rapid urease test (RUT). Background and aim HpSA test, known for being non-invasive, cost-effective, and quick, is contrasted with the fast but invasive RUT. Conducted on 100 adult patients from June to December 2022, the study utilized a comprehensive diagnostic approach, including medical history evaluations, physical exams, abdominal ultrasounds, laboratory tests, and careful stool sample collection. Additionally, all participants underwent RUT, stool antigen tests, and histopathology examinations. Results The findings revealed that the HpSA test identified more positive H. pylori cases (73) than the RUT (59) (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1687-1693 |
DOI: | 10.4103/azmj.azmj_34_24 |