A Multicenter Study Assessing the Optimal Anticoagulation Strategies in COVID-19 Critically III Patients with New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation: Balancing Effectiveness and Safety

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of anticoagulation regimens in COVID-19 critically ill patients with new-onset Atrial fibrillation (Afib) during their intensive care unit (ICU) stays. Methods: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study included critically ill patients with COVID-19...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of general medicine 2024-11, Vol.17, p.5611
Hauptverfasser: Sulaiman, Khalid Al, Aljuhani, Ohoud, Korayem, Ghazwa B, Altebainawi, Ali F, Alharbi, Aisha, Alalawi, Mai, Joharji, Hala, Almohsen, Rand Abdullah, Faden, Rawa M, Alotaibi, Nada, Alshalawi, Bdour S, Alkhushaym, Nasser, Alanazi, Fai F, Alharbi, Ashwaq, Alqarni, Aisha, Samkari, Shahad, Alharbi, Bader, Alshehab, Nura, Alshehri, Rawan A, Vishwakarma, Ramesh
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of anticoagulation regimens in COVID-19 critically ill patients with new-onset Atrial fibrillation (Afib) during their intensive care unit (ICU) stays. Methods: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study included critically ill patients with COVID-19 admitted to the ICUs. Patients with new-onset Afib were categorized into two groups based on anticoagulation doses (Prophylaxis vs Treatment). The primary outcome was the bleeding rate; other outcomes were considered secondary. Logistic, negative binomial regression, and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were applied as appropriate after PS matching. Results: A total of 107 patients were eligible. After PS matching (1:1 ratio), 56 patients were included in the final analysis. A higher odd for major and minor bleeding were observed in the patients who received treatment doses of anticoagulation; however, it did not reach the statistically significant (OR 1.46; 95% CI 0.29, 7.42; P=0.65 and OR 2.04; 95% CI 0.17, 24.3; P=0.57, respectively). The hospital length of stay and in-hospital mortality showed no differences between the two groups (beta coefficient -0.00; CI -0.38, 0.37; P=0.99 and HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.58-2.14; p = 0.74, respectively). On the other hand, patients in the treatment group had a statistically significant higher requirement of RBCs transfusion than patients who received a prophylaxis dose (beta coefficient 1.17; 95% CI 0.11, 2.22, P=0.03). Conclusion: The use of treatment anticoagulation doses in COVID-19 critically ill patients with new-onset Afib did not show better effectiveness over prophylactic anticoagulation doses; however, patients who received treatment anticoagulation doses had higher RBCs transfusion requirements. Our results must be cautious; thus, larger randomized interventional studies with a larger sample size are required to confirm our findings. Keywords: COVID-19, anticoagulation, prophylaxis, treatment dose, thrombosis, bleeding, atrial fibrillation, critically ill, mortality
ISSN:1178-7074
1178-7074
DOI:10.2147/IJGM.S484472