RuleFit-Based Nomogram Using Infammatory Indicators for Predicting Survival in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, a Bi-Center Study
Purpose: Traditional prognostic studies utilized different cut-off values, without evaluating potential information contained in inflammation-related hematological indicators. Using the interpretable machine-learning algorithm RuleFit, this study aimed to explore valuable inflammatory rules reflecti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of inflammation research 2022-08, Vol.15, p.4803 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose: Traditional prognostic studies utilized different cut-off values, without evaluating potential information contained in inflammation-related hematological indicators. Using the interpretable machine-learning algorithm RuleFit, this study aimed to explore valuable inflammatory rules reflecting prognosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients. Patients and Methods: In total, 1706 biopsy-proven NPC patients treated in two independent hospitals (1320 and 386) between January 2010 and March 2014 were included. RuleFit was used to develop risk-predictive rules using hematological indicators with no distributive difference between the two centers. Time-event-dependent hematological rules were further selected by stepwise multi-variate Cox analysis. Combining high-efficiency hematological rules and clinical predictors, a final model was established. Models based on other algorithms (AutoML, Lasso) and clinical predictors were built for comparison, as well as a reported nomogram. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and concordance index (C-index) were used to verify the predictive precision of different models. A site-based app was established for convenience. Results: RuleFit identified 22 combined baseline hematological rules, achieving AUROCs of 0.69 and 0.64 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. By contrast, the AUROCs of the optimal contrast model based on AutoML were 1.00 and 0.58. For overall survival, the final model had a much higher C-index than the base model using TN staging in two cohorts (0.769 vs 0.717, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1178-7031 1178-7031 |
DOI: | 10.2147/JIR.S366922 |