Hepatic resection versus microwave ablation for the treatment of early hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparative analysis of treatment outcomes and survival predictors

Introduction Liver resection and local ablation are the two primary curative treatments for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Microwave ablation (MWA) shows promising performance in terms of early tumor response, recurrence, and survival. This study aims to determine whether MWA would be c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Egyptian Liver Journal 2022-12, Vol.12 (1), p.1-11, Article 48
Hauptverfasser: Osman, Ayman M. A., Abdelaziz, Ashraf Omar, Deweir, Mahmoud, Salah, Ayman, Harb, Shady Tarek Elghazaly, Nabeel, Mohamed Mahmoud, Abdelmaksoud, Ahmed Hosni, Shousha, Hend Ibrahim, Elbaz, Tamer Mahmoud, Hashem, Mohamed B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction Liver resection and local ablation are the two primary curative treatments for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Microwave ablation (MWA) shows promising performance in terms of early tumor response, recurrence, and survival. This study aims to determine whether MWA would be comparable to liver resection in treating early-stage HCC. Methods This study included patients with hepatitis C-related HCC attending the multidisciplinary HCC clinic, Kasr Al-Ainy Hospital (March 2018 to September 2020). We included adults with early-stage HCC (BCLC stages 0-A). We studied patients and tumor characteristics, HCC treatment response, recurrence, and overall survival. Results Thirty-one patients were treated with liver resection and 41 patients were treated with MWA, including 4 patients who received intraoperative MWA. By the end of the study, 21 patients (28.77%) died. Patients who underwent MWA were younger compared to the hepatectomy group with lower baseline AFP (21 (6.7–54) versus 77 (31.3–136.0), respectively, ( P value 0.024) and tumor size (2.78 (0.87) cm versus 3.77 (0.97) cm, respectively, ( P value 
ISSN:2090-6226
2090-6218
2090-6226
DOI:10.1186/s43066-022-00210-2