Inspiratory Muscle Training Strategies in Tracheostomized Critically II Individuals

BACKGROUND: Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) strategies can reduce ICU length of stay and optimize recovery in critically ill patients. Our objective was to compare IMT combined with spontaneous breathing with T-piece in tracheostomized subjects. METHODS: Tracheostomized critically ill subjects who...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Respiratory care 2022-08, Vol.67 (8), p.939
Hauptverfasser: de Figueiredo, Luciana Castilho, Saad, Ivete Alonso Bredda, Falcao, Antonio Luis Eiras, Tonella, Rodrigo Marques, de Oliveira, Pedro Paulo Martins, Ratti, Ligia dos Santos Roceto
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUND: Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) strategies can reduce ICU length of stay and optimize recovery in critically ill patients. Our objective was to compare IMT combined with spontaneous breathing with T-piece in tracheostomized subjects. METHODS: Tracheostomized critically ill subjects who were ready to wean were selected and randomly allocated to one of 2 groups: electronically-assisted IMT (EIMT) or spontaneous breathing with T-piece. Electronically assisted IMT was delivered using 30% of maximal inspiratory pressure (manual EIMT or automatically adjusted loads). The following variables were analyzed: ICU length of stay, weaning time, maximal inspiratory pressure, rapid shallow breathing index, pressure (cm [H.sub.2]O), power (W), flow (L/s), volume (L), and energy (J). RESULTS: A total of 132 patients were assessed; 104 subjects were enrolled with EIMT, n = 51 (automatic EIMT, n = 25 and manual EIMT n = 26), or spontaneous breathing with T-piece group, n = 53. The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score was significantly higher (P =.02) in subjects in the manual EIMT group. Weaning time did not differ significantly between groups (8.55 [+ or -] 6.48 d and 10.86 [+ or -] 6.48 d, EIMT and spontaneous breathing with T-piece group, respectively; P =.23). Weaning success rates (75%) were lower in the manual EIMT group. Invasive mechanical ventilation time was longer but not significantly different (P =.21) in the spontaneous breathing with T-piece group. Maximal inspiratory pressure was significantly higher in the spontaneous breathing with T-piece and the automatic EIMT groups (P
ISSN:0020-1324
DOI:10.4187/respcare.08733