Declarative tracing or backwards tracing—a welcomed development or a misnomer

In Federal Republic of Brazil v Durant International Corpn [2016], the Privy Council upheld the long-disputed concept of backwards tracing. This article argues in favour of the establishment of backwards tracing and attempts to clarify several confusions arising in the development of backwards traci...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Trusts & trustees 2020-12, Vol.26 (10), p.1001-1015
1. Verfasser: Chong, Conrad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In Federal Republic of Brazil v Durant International Corpn [2016], the Privy Council upheld the long-disputed concept of backwards tracing. This article argues in favour of the establishment of backwards tracing and attempts to clarify several confusions arising in the development of backwards tracing, in particular those terminological difficulties. Deriving from the clarification effort, it is advocated that the orthodox tracing process can be interpreted from an additional perspective, based on the ‘negative option’ obtained (but often neglected) by a tracer. Accordingly, it is time to rename backwards tracing as ‘Declarative Tracing’.
ISSN:1363-1780
1752-2110
DOI:10.1093/tandt/ttaa094