Effect of Differences in Month and Location of Measurement in Estimating Prevalence and Trend of Wasting and Stunting in India in 2005-2006 and 2015-2016

Background: Child undernutrition in India remains widespread. Data from the National Family Health Survey 3 and 4 (NFHS-3 and NFHS-4) suggest that wasting prevalence has increased while stunting prevalence has declined. Objective: The objectives of this study were to do the following: 1) describe wa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current developments in nutrition 2020-06, Vol.4 (6), p.1
Hauptverfasser: Madan, Emily M, Frongillo, Edward A, Unisa, Sayeed, Dwivedi, Laxmikant, Johnston, Robert, Daniel, Abner, Agrawal, Praween Z, Deb, Sila, Khera, Ajay, Menon, Purnima, Nguyen, Phuong H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Child undernutrition in India remains widespread. Data from the National Family Health Survey 3 and 4 (NFHS-3 and NFHS-4) suggest that wasting prevalence has increased while stunting prevalence has declined. Objective: The objectives of this study were to do the following: 1) describe wasting and stunting by month of measurement in India in children 5 y in the NFHS-3 and NFHS-4 survey rounds were analyzed. Differences in the prevalence of wasting and stunting by month of year and by state of residence were examined descriptively. Regression analyses were conducted to test the sensitivity of the estimate of differences in wasting and stunting prevalence across survey years to both state differences and seasonality. Results: Examination of the patterns of wasting and stunting by month of measurement and by state across survey years reveal marked variability. When both state and month were adjusted, regardless of the method used to account for sample size, there was a small negative difference from 2005-2006 to 2015-2016 in the prevalence of wasting (--0.8 [+ or -]0.6 percentage points; P = 0.2) and a negative difference in stunting prevalence (--8.3 [+ or -] 0.7 percentage points; P < 0.001), indicating a small bias for wasting but not for stunting in unadjusted analyses. Conclusions: State and seasonal differences may have introduced bias to the estimated difference in prevalence of wasting between the survey years but did not do so for stunting. Future data collection should be designed to maximize consistency in coverage of both time and place. Curr Dev Nutr 2020;4:nzaa092.
ISSN:2475-2991
2475-2991