A neuroimaging biomarker for striatal dysfunction in schizophrenia

Mounting evidence suggests that function and connectivity of the striatum is disrupted in schizophrenia 1 – 5 . We have developed a new hypothesis-driven neuroimaging biomarker for schizophrenia identification, prognosis and subtyping based on functional striatal abnormalities (FSA). FSA scores prov...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nature medicine 2020-04, Vol.26 (4), p.558-565
Hauptverfasser: Li, Ang, Zalesky, Andrew, Yue, Weihua, Howes, Oliver, Yan, Hao, Liu, Yong, Fan, Lingzhong, Whitaker, Kirstie J, Xu, Kaibin, Rao, Guangxiang, Li, Jin, Liu, Shu, Wang, Meng, Sun, Yuqing, Song, Ming, Li, Peng, Chen, Jun, Chen, Yunchun, Wang, Huaning, Liu, Wenming, Li, Zhigang, Yang, Yongfeng, Guo, Hua, Wan, Ping, Lv, Luxian, Lu, Lin, Yan, Jun, Song, Yuqing, Wang, Huiling, Zhang, Hongxing, Wu, Huawang, Ning, Yuping, Du, Yuhui, Cheng, Yuqi, Xu, Jian, Xu, Xiufeng, Zhang, Dai, Wang, Xiaoqun, Jiang, Tianzi, Liu, Bing
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Mounting evidence suggests that function and connectivity of the striatum is disrupted in schizophrenia 1 – 5 . We have developed a new hypothesis-driven neuroimaging biomarker for schizophrenia identification, prognosis and subtyping based on functional striatal abnormalities (FSA). FSA scores provide a personalized index of striatal dysfunction, ranging from normal to highly pathological. Using inter-site cross-validation on functional magnetic resonance images acquired from seven independent scanners ( n  = 1,100), FSA distinguished individuals with schizophrenia from healthy controls with an accuracy exceeding 80% (sensitivity, 79.3%; specificity, 81.5%). In two longitudinal cohorts, inter-individual variation in baseline FSA scores was significantly associated with antipsychotic treatment response. FSA revealed a spectrum of severity in striatal dysfunction across neuropsychiatric disorders, where dysfunction was most severe in schizophrenia, milder in bipolar disorder, and indistinguishable from healthy individuals in depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Loci of striatal hyperactivity recapitulated the spatial distribution of dopaminergic function and the expression profiles of polygenic risk for schizophrenia. In conclusion, we have developed a new biomarker to index striatal dysfunction and established its utility in predicting antipsychotic treatment response, clinical stratification and elucidating striatal dysfunction in neuropsychiatric disorders. A new cross-validated neuroimaging biomarker that reflects striatal dysfunctioning can be used to distinguish patients with schizophrenia from healthy controls, and is associated with treatment response to antipsychotics.
ISSN:1078-8956
1546-170X
DOI:10.1038/s41591-020-0793-8