Fetal weight estimation with ultrasonography/Estimativa do peso fetal por meio de ultrassonografia/Estimativa del peso fetal a traves de la ultrasonografia

The perinatal risks of the changes in fetal growth are well established and the birth weight is therefore an important predictive parameter of perinatal morbidity and mortality, and its correct evaluation is an important tool to obstetrics best practice. The margin of errors in estimated fetal weigh...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Revista Hospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto 2014-07, Vol.13 (3), p.48
Hauptverfasser: Magalhaes, Alessandra L.C, Pereira, Dailson D.S, Jesus, Nilson R. de, Trajano, Alexandre J.B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:spa
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The perinatal risks of the changes in fetal growth are well established and the birth weight is therefore an important predictive parameter of perinatal morbidity and mortality, and its correct evaluation is an important tool to obstetrics best practice. The margin of errors in estimated fetal weight with bidimensional ultrassonography (USG2D), even in ideal conditions, may vary 7 to 10%, with a peak of 14%, which increases the risk of failure in extreme situations, making clear the need to improve the precision of its estimate. Therefore, the aim of this study is to review the literature about ultrassonographic estimated fetal weight, searching for methods with better accuracy that can positively influence clinical practice. The errors in estimated fetal weight by USG2D, notedly near term, should be in part because it's not possible to measure the muscle compartment and soft tissue with this technology, and the variations in these compartments are responsible to 46% of the alterations in birth weight. Currently there is evidence that fetal limbs volumetry associated with bidimensional measures is the best predictor of estimated fetal weight, with margin of error of 6 to 7%, and several studies have used this parameters, reaching more reliable results than the traditional formulas used by USG2D. However, the literature remains controversial in the topic, with studies questioning the advantage of the method. Considering that in pregnancy follow up, notedly high risk, estimated fetal weight is an important parameter analysed, we emphasize the relevance of the search for methods with better accuracy, which can include the incorporation of volumetric measures.
ISSN:1983-2567
1983-2567
DOI:10.12957/rhupe.2014.12137