Comparison between the performance of expansive SCC and expansive conventional concretes in different expansion and curing conditions

•Influence of curing and restraining conditions in expansive SCC was evaluated.•Concrete composition influences the reactivity of the expansive agents.•Type-K agent reactivity depends greater in curing conditions than type-G agent.•Restraining conditions affect the morphology and composition of expa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Construction & building materials 2017-04, Vol.136, p.277-285
Hauptverfasser: García Calvo, J.L., Revuelta, D., Carballosa, P., Gutiérrez, J.P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Influence of curing and restraining conditions in expansive SCC was evaluated.•Concrete composition influences the reactivity of the expansive agents.•Type-K agent reactivity depends greater in curing conditions than type-G agent.•Restraining conditions affect the morphology and composition of expansive hydrates.•Limestone filler is advisable instead of fly ashes when designing expansive SCC. Present paper evaluates the performance of expansive conventional concretes and expansive SCC, their physic-mechanical and microstructural properties, and their uniaxial restraining expansion regime, under different both restraining and curing conditions. The obtained results indicate that restraining conditions influence compressive strength and porosity structure, as well as the morphology and the chemical composition of the resulting expansive hydrates (ettringite formed from type-K agent and portlandite formed from type-G agent). The curing conditions and the concrete composition also influence the reactivity of the expansive agents. The use of limestone filler is advisable instead of fly ashes when designing expansive SCC.
ISSN:0950-0618
1879-0526
DOI:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.039