A Response to Deckers

A Response to Deckers

In this short article I respond, both positively and negatively, but mostly positively, to Jan Deckers’ examination of my defense of nonhuman animal rights from the perspective of process philosophy and from the perspective of what is commonly called the argument from marginal cases.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal ethics 2011-10, Vol.1 (2), p.210-214
1. Verfasser: Dombrowski, Daniel A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Animal rights
Animal Welfare
Animals
Concept of being
Humans
Moral agency
Morality
Philosophy
Pregnancy
Reason
Religions and Theologies
Veganism
Vegetarianism
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In this short article I respond, both positively and negatively, but mostly positively, to Jan Deckers’ examination of my defense of nonhuman animal rights from the perspective of process philosophy and from the perspective of what is commonly called the argument from marginal cases.
ISSN:2156-5414
2160-1267
DOI:10.5406/janimalethics.1.2.0210