Algorithm update of the GOSAT/TANSO-FTS thermal infrared CO.sub.2 product and validation of the UTLS CO.sub.2 data using CONTRAIL measurements

The Thermal and Near Infrared Sensor for Carbon Observation (TANSO)-Fourier Transform Spectrometer (FTS) on board the Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT) has been observing carbon dioxide (CO.sub.2) concentrations in several atmospheric layers in the thermal infrared (TIR) band since it...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Atmospheric measurement techniques 2016-05, Vol.9 (5), p.2119
Hauptverfasser: Saitoh, Naoko, Kimoto, Shuhei, Sugimura, Ryo, Imasu, Ryoichi, Kawakami, Shuji, Shiomi, Kei, Kuze, Akihiko, Machida, Toshinobu, Sawa, Yousuke, Matsueda, Hidekazu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The Thermal and Near Infrared Sensor for Carbon Observation (TANSO)-Fourier Transform Spectrometer (FTS) on board the Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT) has been observing carbon dioxide (CO.sub.2) concentrations in several atmospheric layers in the thermal infrared (TIR) band since its launch. This study compared TANSO-FTS TIR version 1 (V1) CO.sub.2 data and CO.sub.2 data obtained in the Comprehensive Observation Network for TRace gases by AIrLiner (CONTRAIL) project in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UTLS), where the TIR band of TANSO-FTS is most sensitive to CO.sub.2 concentrations, to validate the quality of the TIR V1 UTLS CO.sub.2 data from 287 to 162 hPa. We first evaluated the impact of considering TIR CO.sub.2 averaging kernel functions on CO.sub.2 concentrations using CO.sub.2 profile data obtained by the CONTRAIL Continuous CO.sub.2 Measuring Equipment (CME), and found that the impact at around the CME level flight altitudes (∼ 11 km) was on average less than 0.5 ppm at low latitudes and less than 1 ppm at middle and high latitudes. From a comparison made during flights between Tokyo and Sydney, the averages of the TIR upper-atmospheric CO.sub.2 data were within 0.1 % of the averages of the CONTRAIL CME CO.sub.2 data with and without TIR CO.sub.2 averaging kernels for all seasons in the Southern Hemisphere. The results of comparisons for all of the eight airline routes showed that the agreements of TIR and CME CO.sub.2 data were worse in spring and summer than in fall and winter in the Northern Hemisphere in the upper troposphere. While the differences between TIR and CME CO.sub.2 data were on average within 1 ppm in fall and winter, TIR CO.sub.2 data had a negative bias up to 2.4 ppm against CME CO.sub.2 data with TIR CO.sub.2 averaging kernels at the northern low and middle latitudes in spring and summer. The negative bias at the northern middle latitudes resulted in the maximum of TIR CO.sub.2 concentrations being lower than that of CME CO.sub.2 concentrations, which led to an underestimate of the amplitude of CO.sub.2 seasonal variation.
ISSN:1867-1381
1867-8548