Once again about determination and detection limits
The papers takes stock of different methods for evaluating the detection ( c min ) and determination ( c lim ) limits of components described in the literature and presents a comparative analysis of the results of such evaluations. It is shown that use of the data on the fluctuations of the blank ex...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of analytical chemistry (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2010-03, Vol.65 (3), p.223-228 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The papers takes stock of different methods for evaluating the detection (
c
min
) and determination (
c
lim
) limits of components described in the literature and presents a comparative analysis of the results of such evaluations. It is shown that use of the data on the fluctuations of the blank experiment, in spite of their wide application for such evaluations, gives ambiguous estimates for
c
min
and
c
lim
. The most correct method for evaluating the specified parameters is the experimental determination of the actual analyte concentration (content) from the empirical concentration dependence of the relative standard deviation. In case when this estimation method cannot be used, it is recommended to evaluate
c
lim
by the lower boundary of the calibration graph. The article may be useful for inexperienced analysts experimenters in choosing a method for evaluating the results obtained. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1061-9348 1608-3199 |
DOI: | 10.1134/S1061934810030020 |