Effectiveness of a no-sex or safe-sex month in reducing HIV transmission/Efficacite d'un mois d'abstinence ou de rapports sexuels proteges pour reduire la transmission du VIH/La eficacia de un mes de abstinencia o de sexo sin riesgos para reducir la transmision del VIH

Objective To build a deterministic compartmental model for exploring the effects on the transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) of a population abstaining from sex or practising only "safe" sex for one month each year. Methods A model of HIV transmission was built to simulate th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2012-07, Vol.90 (7), p.504
Hauptverfasser: Lucas, Aaron M, Armbruster, Benjamin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective To build a deterministic compartmental model for exploring the effects on the transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) of a population abstaining from sex or practising only "safe" sex for one month each year. Methods A model of HIV transmission was built to simulate the effects of the intervention (i.e. an annual no-sex or safe-sex month in which no transmission occurred) in three countries, under several optimistic assumptions. The reduction in the modelled annual incidence of transmission that was attributable to this "test" intervention was compared with that seen with an alternative intervention. In the latter, monthly incidences of transmission were each reduced by one twelfth, so that, essentially, the month-long interruption was spread evenly across a full year. Findings Over the first modelled year, the test intervention averted only 2.5% (Kenya), 3.3% (South Africa) and 1.6% (Swaziland) more HIV infections than the alternative interruption. According to the model, if the test intervention were repeated each January, it would avert only 2% (Kenya), 2% (South Africa) and 1% (Swaziland) more HIV infections over 5 years than the alternative intervention. Conclusion Although it did not appear markedly more effective than the alternative intervention, the test intervention may still be more feasible and therefore worthwhile. Before the test intervention can be recommended, the cost-effectiveness and feasibility of such an annual month-long break in HIV transmission need to be assessed and compared with those of other interventions that may reduce new HIV infections, such as circumcision and concurrency-reduction campaigns. Objectif Elaborer un modele comportemental deterministe pour etudier les effets de l'abstinence sexuelle ou de rapports sexuels exclusivement proteges d'une population, pendant un mois chaque annee, sur la transmission du virus de l'immunodeficience humaine (VIH). Methodes Un modele de transmission du VIH a ete cree pour simuler les effets de l'intervention (c'est-a-dire un mois d'abstinence sexuelle ou de rapports sexuels proteges chaque annee, au cours duquel aucune transmission n'a eu lieu) dans trois pays, en appliquant plusieurs hypotheses optimistes. La reduction de l'incidence de transmission annuelle modelisee attribuable a ce a ete comparee a celle qui a ete observee avec une intervention alternative. Dans ce dernier cas, les incidences de transmission mensuelles ont diminue d'un douzieme, de sorte que
ISSN:0042-9686
DOI:10.2471/BLT.11.088641