Timing of Changes in Interstitial and Venous Blood Glucose Measured With a Continuous Subcutaneous Glucose Sensor
Timing of Changes in Interstitial and Venous Blood Glucose Measured With a Continuous Subcutaneous Glucose Sensor Michael S. Boyne , David M. Silver , Joy Kaplan and Christopher D. Saudek From the Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and the Applied P...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Diabetes (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2003-11, Vol.52 (11), p.2790-2794 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Timing of Changes in Interstitial and Venous Blood Glucose Measured With a Continuous Subcutaneous Glucose Sensor
Michael S. Boyne ,
David M. Silver ,
Joy Kaplan and
Christopher D. Saudek
From the Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and the Applied Physics Laboratory,
Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Christopher D. Saudek, MD, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Osler
576, 600 North Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21287. E-mail: csaudek{at}jhu.edu
Abstract
The objective of this study was to use a subcutaneous continuous glucose sensor to determine time differences in the dynamics
of blood glucose and interstitial glucose. A total of 14 patients with type 1 diabetes each had two sensors (Medtronic/MiniMed
CGMS) placed subcutaneously in the abdomen, acquiring data every 5 min. Blood glucose was sampled every 5 min for 8 h, and
two liquid meals were given. A smoothing algorithm was applied to the blood glucose and interstitial glucose curves. The first
derivatives of the glucose traces defined and quantified the timing of rises, peaks, falls, and nadirs. Altogether, 24 datasets
were used for the analysis of time differences between interstitial and blood glucose and between sensors in each patient.
Time differences between blood and interstitial glucose ranged from 4 to 10 min, with the interstitial glucose lagging behind
blood glucose in 81% of cases (95% CIs 72.5 and 89.5%). The mean (±SD) difference between the two sensors in each patient
was 6.7 ± 5.1 min, representing random variation in sensor response. In conclusion, there is a time lag of interstitial glucose
behind blood glucose, regardless of whether glycemia is rising or falling, but intersensor variability is considerable in
this sensor system. Comparisons of interstitial and blood glucose kinetics must take statistical account of variability between
sensors.
CGMS, continuous glucose monitoring system
FDA, Food and Drug Administration
IV, intravenous
Footnotes
Accepted August 18, 2003.
Received December 2, 2002.
DIABETES |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0012-1797 1939-327X |
DOI: | 10.2337/diabetes.52.11.2790 |