Stabilization of Chromium : Method Development and Validation
The presence of Cr (VI) in drinking water is mainly caused by leaching of chromium-containing aquifer material into groundwater. In contrast to Cr (III), it has been classified as highly toxic. For this reason, the WHO recommends the implementation of separate guideline values, instead of the so far...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water (Basel) 2020-04, Vol.12 (4) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Water (Basel) |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Mahringer, Daniel Polenz, Chantal El-Athman, Fatima |
description | The presence of Cr (VI) in drinking water is mainly caused by leaching of chromium-containing aquifer material into groundwater. In contrast to Cr (III), it has been classified as highly toxic. For this reason, the WHO recommends the implementation of separate guideline values, instead of the so far used limit value of total chromium. The separate evaluation of Cr (VI) in raw water and during removal processes requires the Cr (VI) concentration to remain stable after sampling. In the presence of Fe (II), a stabilization of the samples is necessary to inhibit further reduction of Cr (VI) by Fe (II). In this study, two methods of Cr (VI) stabilization in Fe-(II)-containing water samples are investigated: Fe (II) oxidation by oxygen at high pH values in the presence of buffers and Fe (II) complexation by chelating agents. When adding hydrogen carbonate buffer, Cr (VI) recovery reached 100% at pH values of 10 to 12 in the presence of up to 3 mg L[sup.–1] Fe (II). Using hydrogen phosphate buffer, Cr (VI) recovery reached 100% only at pH 12 but for a Fe (II) concentration up to 6 mg L[sup.–1]. Ammonium buffer was found to be less suitable for Cr (VI) stabilization. The addition of EDTA and citrate resulted in low recovery of Cr (VI), whereas citrate was found to accelerate the Cr (VI) reduction. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/w12040924 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A791294746</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A791294746</galeid><sourcerecordid>A791294746</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A7912947463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVi70KwjAAhIMoWLSDb5AXaM2fthEcxB9cnBRXiU1iI2kibVTw6S3i4OrdcB_HHQAjjFJKORo_MUEMccI6ICIoowljDHd_uA_iprmiVozn-QRFYL4P4myseYlgvINew2VZ-8rcKziDOxVKL-FKPZT1t0q5AIWT8CiskZ_9EPS0sI2KvzkA6WZ9WG6Ti7DqZJz2oRZFa6kqU3intGn7RcYx4SxjU_r34Q2UiEWe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stabilization of Chromium : Method Development and Validation</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Mahringer, Daniel ; Polenz, Chantal ; El-Athman, Fatima</creator><creatorcontrib>Mahringer, Daniel ; Polenz, Chantal ; El-Athman, Fatima</creatorcontrib><description>The presence of Cr (VI) in drinking water is mainly caused by leaching of chromium-containing aquifer material into groundwater. In contrast to Cr (III), it has been classified as highly toxic. For this reason, the WHO recommends the implementation of separate guideline values, instead of the so far used limit value of total chromium. The separate evaluation of Cr (VI) in raw water and during removal processes requires the Cr (VI) concentration to remain stable after sampling. In the presence of Fe (II), a stabilization of the samples is necessary to inhibit further reduction of Cr (VI) by Fe (II). In this study, two methods of Cr (VI) stabilization in Fe-(II)-containing water samples are investigated: Fe (II) oxidation by oxygen at high pH values in the presence of buffers and Fe (II) complexation by chelating agents. When adding hydrogen carbonate buffer, Cr (VI) recovery reached 100% at pH values of 10 to 12 in the presence of up to 3 mg L[sup.–1] Fe (II). Using hydrogen phosphate buffer, Cr (VI) recovery reached 100% only at pH 12 but for a Fe (II) concentration up to 6 mg L[sup.–1]. Ammonium buffer was found to be less suitable for Cr (VI) stabilization. The addition of EDTA and citrate resulted in low recovery of Cr (VI), whereas citrate was found to accelerate the Cr (VI) reduction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/w12040924</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid ; Methods ; Pharmaceutical industry</subject><ispartof>Water (Basel), 2020-04, Vol.12 (4)</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 MDPI AG</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mahringer, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polenz, Chantal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Athman, Fatima</creatorcontrib><title>Stabilization of Chromium : Method Development and Validation</title><title>Water (Basel)</title><description>The presence of Cr (VI) in drinking water is mainly caused by leaching of chromium-containing aquifer material into groundwater. In contrast to Cr (III), it has been classified as highly toxic. For this reason, the WHO recommends the implementation of separate guideline values, instead of the so far used limit value of total chromium. The separate evaluation of Cr (VI) in raw water and during removal processes requires the Cr (VI) concentration to remain stable after sampling. In the presence of Fe (II), a stabilization of the samples is necessary to inhibit further reduction of Cr (VI) by Fe (II). In this study, two methods of Cr (VI) stabilization in Fe-(II)-containing water samples are investigated: Fe (II) oxidation by oxygen at high pH values in the presence of buffers and Fe (II) complexation by chelating agents. When adding hydrogen carbonate buffer, Cr (VI) recovery reached 100% at pH values of 10 to 12 in the presence of up to 3 mg L[sup.–1] Fe (II). Using hydrogen phosphate buffer, Cr (VI) recovery reached 100% only at pH 12 but for a Fe (II) concentration up to 6 mg L[sup.–1]. Ammonium buffer was found to be less suitable for Cr (VI) stabilization. The addition of EDTA and citrate resulted in low recovery of Cr (VI), whereas citrate was found to accelerate the Cr (VI) reduction.</description><subject>Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical industry</subject><issn>2073-4441</issn><issn>2073-4441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqVi70KwjAAhIMoWLSDb5AXaM2fthEcxB9cnBRXiU1iI2kibVTw6S3i4OrdcB_HHQAjjFJKORo_MUEMccI6ICIoowljDHd_uA_iprmiVozn-QRFYL4P4myseYlgvINew2VZ-8rcKziDOxVKL-FKPZT1t0q5AIWT8CiskZ_9EPS0sI2KvzkA6WZ9WG6Ti7DqZJz2oRZFa6kqU3intGn7RcYx4SxjU_r34Q2UiEWe</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>Mahringer, Daniel</creator><creator>Polenz, Chantal</creator><creator>El-Athman, Fatima</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>Stabilization of Chromium : Method Development and Validation</title><author>Mahringer, Daniel ; Polenz, Chantal ; El-Athman, Fatima</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A7912947463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical industry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mahringer, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polenz, Chantal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Athman, Fatima</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mahringer, Daniel</au><au>Polenz, Chantal</au><au>El-Athman, Fatima</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stabilization of Chromium : Method Development and Validation</atitle><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>4</issue><issn>2073-4441</issn><eissn>2073-4441</eissn><abstract>The presence of Cr (VI) in drinking water is mainly caused by leaching of chromium-containing aquifer material into groundwater. In contrast to Cr (III), it has been classified as highly toxic. For this reason, the WHO recommends the implementation of separate guideline values, instead of the so far used limit value of total chromium. The separate evaluation of Cr (VI) in raw water and during removal processes requires the Cr (VI) concentration to remain stable after sampling. In the presence of Fe (II), a stabilization of the samples is necessary to inhibit further reduction of Cr (VI) by Fe (II). In this study, two methods of Cr (VI) stabilization in Fe-(II)-containing water samples are investigated: Fe (II) oxidation by oxygen at high pH values in the presence of buffers and Fe (II) complexation by chelating agents. When adding hydrogen carbonate buffer, Cr (VI) recovery reached 100% at pH values of 10 to 12 in the presence of up to 3 mg L[sup.–1] Fe (II). Using hydrogen phosphate buffer, Cr (VI) recovery reached 100% only at pH 12 but for a Fe (II) concentration up to 6 mg L[sup.–1]. Ammonium buffer was found to be less suitable for Cr (VI) stabilization. The addition of EDTA and citrate resulted in low recovery of Cr (VI), whereas citrate was found to accelerate the Cr (VI) reduction.</abstract><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/w12040924</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2073-4441 |
ispartof | Water (Basel), 2020-04, Vol.12 (4) |
issn | 2073-4441 2073-4441 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A791294746 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid Methods Pharmaceutical industry |
title | Stabilization of Chromium : Method Development and Validation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T05%3A23%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stabilization%20of%20Chromium%20:%20Method%20Development%20and%20Validation&rft.jtitle=Water%20(Basel)&rft.au=Mahringer,%20Daniel&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=4&rft.issn=2073-4441&rft.eissn=2073-4441&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/w12040924&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA791294746%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A791294746&rfr_iscdi=true |