Stabilization of Chromium : Method Development and Validation

The presence of Cr (VI) in drinking water is mainly caused by leaching of chromium-containing aquifer material into groundwater. In contrast to Cr (III), it has been classified as highly toxic. For this reason, the WHO recommends the implementation of separate guideline values, instead of the so far...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water (Basel) 2020-04, Vol.12 (4)
Hauptverfasser: Mahringer, Daniel, Polenz, Chantal, El-Athman, Fatima
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page
container_title Water (Basel)
container_volume 12
creator Mahringer, Daniel
Polenz, Chantal
El-Athman, Fatima
description The presence of Cr (VI) in drinking water is mainly caused by leaching of chromium-containing aquifer material into groundwater. In contrast to Cr (III), it has been classified as highly toxic. For this reason, the WHO recommends the implementation of separate guideline values, instead of the so far used limit value of total chromium. The separate evaluation of Cr (VI) in raw water and during removal processes requires the Cr (VI) concentration to remain stable after sampling. In the presence of Fe (II), a stabilization of the samples is necessary to inhibit further reduction of Cr (VI) by Fe (II). In this study, two methods of Cr (VI) stabilization in Fe-(II)-containing water samples are investigated: Fe (II) oxidation by oxygen at high pH values in the presence of buffers and Fe (II) complexation by chelating agents. When adding hydrogen carbonate buffer, Cr (VI) recovery reached 100% at pH values of 10 to 12 in the presence of up to 3 mg L[sup.–1] Fe (II). Using hydrogen phosphate buffer, Cr (VI) recovery reached 100% only at pH 12 but for a Fe (II) concentration up to 6 mg L[sup.–1]. Ammonium buffer was found to be less suitable for Cr (VI) stabilization. The addition of EDTA and citrate resulted in low recovery of Cr (VI), whereas citrate was found to accelerate the Cr (VI) reduction.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/w12040924
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A791294746</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A791294746</galeid><sourcerecordid>A791294746</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A7912947463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVi70KwjAAhIMoWLSDb5AXaM2fthEcxB9cnBRXiU1iI2kibVTw6S3i4OrdcB_HHQAjjFJKORo_MUEMccI6ICIoowljDHd_uA_iprmiVozn-QRFYL4P4myseYlgvINew2VZ-8rcKziDOxVKL-FKPZT1t0q5AIWT8CiskZ_9EPS0sI2KvzkA6WZ9WG6Ti7DqZJz2oRZFa6kqU3intGn7RcYx4SxjU_r34Q2UiEWe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stabilization of Chromium : Method Development and Validation</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Mahringer, Daniel ; Polenz, Chantal ; El-Athman, Fatima</creator><creatorcontrib>Mahringer, Daniel ; Polenz, Chantal ; El-Athman, Fatima</creatorcontrib><description>The presence of Cr (VI) in drinking water is mainly caused by leaching of chromium-containing aquifer material into groundwater. In contrast to Cr (III), it has been classified as highly toxic. For this reason, the WHO recommends the implementation of separate guideline values, instead of the so far used limit value of total chromium. The separate evaluation of Cr (VI) in raw water and during removal processes requires the Cr (VI) concentration to remain stable after sampling. In the presence of Fe (II), a stabilization of the samples is necessary to inhibit further reduction of Cr (VI) by Fe (II). In this study, two methods of Cr (VI) stabilization in Fe-(II)-containing water samples are investigated: Fe (II) oxidation by oxygen at high pH values in the presence of buffers and Fe (II) complexation by chelating agents. When adding hydrogen carbonate buffer, Cr (VI) recovery reached 100% at pH values of 10 to 12 in the presence of up to 3 mg L[sup.–1] Fe (II). Using hydrogen phosphate buffer, Cr (VI) recovery reached 100% only at pH 12 but for a Fe (II) concentration up to 6 mg L[sup.–1]. Ammonium buffer was found to be less suitable for Cr (VI) stabilization. The addition of EDTA and citrate resulted in low recovery of Cr (VI), whereas citrate was found to accelerate the Cr (VI) reduction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/w12040924</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid ; Methods ; Pharmaceutical industry</subject><ispartof>Water (Basel), 2020-04, Vol.12 (4)</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 MDPI AG</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mahringer, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polenz, Chantal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Athman, Fatima</creatorcontrib><title>Stabilization of Chromium : Method Development and Validation</title><title>Water (Basel)</title><description>The presence of Cr (VI) in drinking water is mainly caused by leaching of chromium-containing aquifer material into groundwater. In contrast to Cr (III), it has been classified as highly toxic. For this reason, the WHO recommends the implementation of separate guideline values, instead of the so far used limit value of total chromium. The separate evaluation of Cr (VI) in raw water and during removal processes requires the Cr (VI) concentration to remain stable after sampling. In the presence of Fe (II), a stabilization of the samples is necessary to inhibit further reduction of Cr (VI) by Fe (II). In this study, two methods of Cr (VI) stabilization in Fe-(II)-containing water samples are investigated: Fe (II) oxidation by oxygen at high pH values in the presence of buffers and Fe (II) complexation by chelating agents. When adding hydrogen carbonate buffer, Cr (VI) recovery reached 100% at pH values of 10 to 12 in the presence of up to 3 mg L[sup.–1] Fe (II). Using hydrogen phosphate buffer, Cr (VI) recovery reached 100% only at pH 12 but for a Fe (II) concentration up to 6 mg L[sup.–1]. Ammonium buffer was found to be less suitable for Cr (VI) stabilization. The addition of EDTA and citrate resulted in low recovery of Cr (VI), whereas citrate was found to accelerate the Cr (VI) reduction.</description><subject>Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical industry</subject><issn>2073-4441</issn><issn>2073-4441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqVi70KwjAAhIMoWLSDb5AXaM2fthEcxB9cnBRXiU1iI2kibVTw6S3i4OrdcB_HHQAjjFJKORo_MUEMccI6ICIoowljDHd_uA_iprmiVozn-QRFYL4P4myseYlgvINew2VZ-8rcKziDOxVKL-FKPZT1t0q5AIWT8CiskZ_9EPS0sI2KvzkA6WZ9WG6Ti7DqZJz2oRZFa6kqU3intGn7RcYx4SxjU_r34Q2UiEWe</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>Mahringer, Daniel</creator><creator>Polenz, Chantal</creator><creator>El-Athman, Fatima</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>Stabilization of Chromium : Method Development and Validation</title><author>Mahringer, Daniel ; Polenz, Chantal ; El-Athman, Fatima</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-gale_infotracacademiconefile_A7912947463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical industry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mahringer, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polenz, Chantal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Athman, Fatima</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mahringer, Daniel</au><au>Polenz, Chantal</au><au>El-Athman, Fatima</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stabilization of Chromium : Method Development and Validation</atitle><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>4</issue><issn>2073-4441</issn><eissn>2073-4441</eissn><abstract>The presence of Cr (VI) in drinking water is mainly caused by leaching of chromium-containing aquifer material into groundwater. In contrast to Cr (III), it has been classified as highly toxic. For this reason, the WHO recommends the implementation of separate guideline values, instead of the so far used limit value of total chromium. The separate evaluation of Cr (VI) in raw water and during removal processes requires the Cr (VI) concentration to remain stable after sampling. In the presence of Fe (II), a stabilization of the samples is necessary to inhibit further reduction of Cr (VI) by Fe (II). In this study, two methods of Cr (VI) stabilization in Fe-(II)-containing water samples are investigated: Fe (II) oxidation by oxygen at high pH values in the presence of buffers and Fe (II) complexation by chelating agents. When adding hydrogen carbonate buffer, Cr (VI) recovery reached 100% at pH values of 10 to 12 in the presence of up to 3 mg L[sup.–1] Fe (II). Using hydrogen phosphate buffer, Cr (VI) recovery reached 100% only at pH 12 but for a Fe (II) concentration up to 6 mg L[sup.–1]. Ammonium buffer was found to be less suitable for Cr (VI) stabilization. The addition of EDTA and citrate resulted in low recovery of Cr (VI), whereas citrate was found to accelerate the Cr (VI) reduction.</abstract><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/w12040924</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2073-4441
ispartof Water (Basel), 2020-04, Vol.12 (4)
issn 2073-4441
2073-4441
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracacademiconefile_A791294746
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
Methods
Pharmaceutical industry
title Stabilization of Chromium : Method Development and Validation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T05%3A23%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stabilization%20of%20Chromium%20:%20Method%20Development%20and%20Validation&rft.jtitle=Water%20(Basel)&rft.au=Mahringer,%20Daniel&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=4&rft.issn=2073-4441&rft.eissn=2073-4441&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/w12040924&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA791294746%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A791294746&rfr_iscdi=true