The Marital Relationship and Psychosocial Adaptation and Glycemic Control of Individuals With Diabetes

The Marital Relationship and Psychosocial Adaptation and Glycemic Control of Individuals With Diabetes Paula M. Trief , PHD 1 , Christine L. Himes , PHD 2 , Rebecca Orendorff , BS 1 and Ruth S. Weinstock , MD, PHD 1 3 4 1 State University of New York (SUNY) Upstate Medical University 2 Syracuse Univ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetes care 2001-08, Vol.24 (8), p.1384-1389
Hauptverfasser: Trief, P M, Himes, C L, Orendorff, R, Weinstock, R S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The Marital Relationship and Psychosocial Adaptation and Glycemic Control of Individuals With Diabetes Paula M. Trief , PHD 1 , Christine L. Himes , PHD 2 , Rebecca Orendorff , BS 1 and Ruth S. Weinstock , MD, PHD 1 3 4 1 State University of New York (SUNY) Upstate Medical University 2 Syracuse University 3 Joslin Diabetes Center at Syracuse 4 Veterans Administration Medical Center, Syracuse, New York Abstract OBJECTIVE —To explore the relationship between marital relationship domains (i.e., intimacy and adjustment) and glycemic control and psychosocial adaptation to diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS —A total of 78 insulin-treated adults with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes were assessed on a single occasion. They completed two marital quality measures (Spanier Dyadic Adjustment Scale and Personal Assessment of Intimacy in Relationships Scale) and four quality-of-life measures (Diabetes Quality of Life Scale, Medical Outcomes Study Health Survey, Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale, and Positive and Negative Affect Scale). Glycemic control was assessed by HbA 1c . Demographic data (age, sex, type and duration of diabetes, years married, other medical conditions, family history, disability, and years of education) were gathered from the chart and questionnaires. RESULTS —Concerning psychosocial adaptation, both of the marital quality measures were predictors of aspects of adaptation. Better marital satisfaction was related to higher levels of diabetes-related satisfaction and less impact, as well as less diabetes-related distress and better general quality of life. Higher levels of marital intimacy were related to better diabetes-specific and general quality of life. Concerning glycemic control, there was a nonsignificant trend for marital adjustment scores to relate to HbA 1c ( P = 0.0568). CONCLUSIONS —For insulin-treated adults with diabetes, quality of marriage is associated with adaptation to diabetes and other aspects of health-related quality of life. The suggestive finding that marital adjustment may relate to glycemic control warrants further study. Future work should also explore the impact of couples-focused interventions on adaptation, adherence, and glycemic control. BG, blood glucose DAS, Spanier Dyadic Adjustment Scale DCCT, Diabetes Control and Complications Trial DQOL, Diabetes Quality of Life Scale MCS, Mental Composite Scores PAID, Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale PAIR, Personal Assessment of Intimacy in Relationships PANAS, Positive and N
ISSN:0149-5992
1935-5548
DOI:10.2337/diacare.24.8.1384