The Marital Relationship and Psychosocial Adaptation and Glycemic Control of Individuals With Diabetes
The Marital Relationship and Psychosocial Adaptation and Glycemic Control of Individuals With Diabetes Paula M. Trief , PHD 1 , Christine L. Himes , PHD 2 , Rebecca Orendorff , BS 1 and Ruth S. Weinstock , MD, PHD 1 3 4 1 State University of New York (SUNY) Upstate Medical University 2 Syracuse Univ...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Diabetes care 2001-08, Vol.24 (8), p.1384-1389 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The Marital Relationship and Psychosocial Adaptation and Glycemic Control of Individuals With Diabetes
Paula M. Trief , PHD 1 ,
Christine L. Himes , PHD 2 ,
Rebecca Orendorff , BS 1 and
Ruth S. Weinstock , MD, PHD 1 3 4
1 State University of New York (SUNY) Upstate Medical University
2 Syracuse University
3 Joslin Diabetes Center at Syracuse
4 Veterans Administration Medical Center, Syracuse, New York
Abstract
OBJECTIVE —To explore the relationship between marital relationship domains (i.e., intimacy and adjustment) and glycemic control and
psychosocial adaptation to diabetes.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS —A total of 78 insulin-treated adults with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes were assessed on a single occasion. They completed
two marital quality measures (Spanier Dyadic Adjustment Scale and Personal Assessment of Intimacy in Relationships Scale)
and four quality-of-life measures (Diabetes Quality of Life Scale, Medical Outcomes Study Health Survey, Problem Areas in
Diabetes Scale, and Positive and Negative Affect Scale). Glycemic control was assessed by HbA 1c . Demographic data (age, sex, type and duration of diabetes, years married, other medical conditions, family history, disability,
and years of education) were gathered from the chart and questionnaires.
RESULTS —Concerning psychosocial adaptation, both of the marital quality measures were predictors of aspects of adaptation. Better
marital satisfaction was related to higher levels of diabetes-related satisfaction and less impact, as well as less diabetes-related
distress and better general quality of life. Higher levels of marital intimacy were related to better diabetes-specific and
general quality of life. Concerning glycemic control, there was a nonsignificant trend for marital adjustment scores to relate
to HbA 1c ( P = 0.0568).
CONCLUSIONS —For insulin-treated adults with diabetes, quality of marriage is associated with adaptation to diabetes and other aspects
of health-related quality of life. The suggestive finding that marital adjustment may relate to glycemic control warrants
further study. Future work should also explore the impact of couples-focused interventions on adaptation, adherence, and glycemic
control.
BG, blood glucose
DAS, Spanier Dyadic Adjustment Scale
DCCT, Diabetes Control and Complications Trial
DQOL, Diabetes Quality of Life Scale
MCS, Mental Composite Scores
PAID, Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale
PAIR, Personal Assessment of Intimacy in Relationships
PANAS, Positive and N |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0149-5992 1935-5548 |
DOI: | 10.2337/diacare.24.8.1384 |