Dynamics of Soil Organic Carbon and CO[sub.2] Flux under Cover Crop and No-Till Management in Soybean Cropping Systems of the Mid-South

The transition of natural landscapes to agricultural uses has resulted in severe loss of soil organic carbon, significantly contributing to CO[sub.2] emissions and rising global temperatures. However, soil has the largest store of terrestrial carbon (C), a considerable sink and effective strategy fo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environments (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2022-08, Vol.9 (9)
Hauptverfasser: Firth, Alexandra G, Brooks, John P, Locke, Ma, Morin, Dana J, Brown, Ashli, Baker, Beth H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The transition of natural landscapes to agricultural uses has resulted in severe loss of soil organic carbon, significantly contributing to CO[sub.2] emissions and rising global temperatures. However, soil has the largest store of terrestrial carbon (C), a considerable sink and effective strategy for climate change mitigation if managed properly. Cover crops (CC) and no-till (NT) management are two management strategies that are known to increase percent organic carbon (%OC); however, adoption of these practices has been low in the mid-South due to lack of region-specific research and resistance to unproven practices. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the impacts of CC-NT treatments in soybean cropping systems on soil percent organic carbon (%OC) and CO[sub.2] flux following long-term implementation. Results showed significantly greater %OC in NT (1.27% ± 0.03) than reduced till (RT; 1.10% ± 0.03; p < 0.001) and greater in both CC (rye: 1.23% ± 0.03, rye + clover: 1.22% ± 0.03) than no cover (1.11% ± 0.03; p < 0.001). Bacterial abundance (p = 0.005) and pH (p = 0.006) were significant predictors of %OC. There was no overall significant difference in CO[sub.2] flux between tillage or CC treatments; however, there were significant differences between NT and RT in July of 2020 when %RH increased (p < 0.001). Bacterial abundance negatively impacted CO[sub.2] flux (p < 0.05), which contradicts most studies. The rate of proportional change and pattern of variability in C pools suggested loss of %OC in RT treatments that were not apparent when considering %OC alone. The results of this study provide valuable insight into C turnover and the effectiveness of CC use in the Mid-South to increase soil C stocks.
ISSN:2076-3298
2076-3298
DOI:10.3390/environments9090109