TYMPANOPLASTY TYPE-1: DIFFERENT APPROACHES AND THEIR SURGICAL OUTCOMES

Objective: To calculate the surgical outcomes of different approaches of tympanoplasty type 1 in terms of air bone gap closure, wound healing, and postoperative pain. Study Design: Prospective cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Teach...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pakistan Armed Forces medical journal 2021-12, Vol.71 (Suppl-3), p.S495-99
Hauptverfasser: Wahid, Fazal I, Manan, Abdul, Saleem, Muhammad, Zada, Bakht, Rehman, Habib -Ur, Haq, Naseem Ul, Javaid, Muhammad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: To calculate the surgical outcomes of different approaches of tympanoplasty type 1 in terms of air bone gap closure, wound healing, and postoperative pain. Study Design: Prospective cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Teaching Institute (MTI), Lady Reading Hospital (LRH), Peshawar, Pakistan from Jun 2018 to May 2020. Methodology: Size of sample was 75 patients divided into three groups. Consent was obtained from all the patients included in study. After proper evaluation and relevant investigation pre- and post-operative PTA was performed. Tympanoplasty type-1 was performed by the same surgeon by the three approaches following established otological surgical protocol. Collected data was entered in SPSS-25 for analysis. Results: All 75 patients were divided into three equal groups. Male were 55 (73.3%), females were 20 (26.7%). Male: female ratio was 2.7:1. Majority of patients presented in 2nd and 3rd decades of life 31 (41.33%) and 28 (37.33%) respectively. Preoperative mean ± SD, ABG in groups A, B and C were 37.60 ± 11.28 dB, 37 ± 9.68 dB and 31.80 ± 12.40 dB, respectively. No significant difference was found amongst the three groups regarding pre-operative and post-operative ABG (p=0.85 and p=0.4), respectively. Mean ± SD, wound healing time in Groups A, B and C were 1.00 ± 0.00, 1.80 ± 0.40 and 1.76 ± 0.43 respectively with p=0.0001 and similarly postoperative pain with p=0.001. The wound healing time and post-operative was statistically better (p
ISSN:0030-9648
2411-8842
DOI:10.51253/pafmj.v1i1.7938