Predictors of glycemic control in insulin-using adults with type 2 diabetes
Predictors of glycemic control in insulin-using adults with type 2 diabetes. G A Nichols , T A Hillier , K Javor and J B Brown Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest Division, Portland, Oregon 97227-1098, USA. greg.nichols@kp.org Abstract OBJECTIVE: To determine the characteristics...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Diabetes care 2000-03, Vol.23 (3), p.273-277 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Predictors of glycemic control in insulin-using adults with type 2 diabetes.
G A Nichols ,
T A Hillier ,
K Javor and
J B Brown
Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest Division, Portland, Oregon 97227-1098, USA. greg.nichols@kp.org
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the characteristics that influence glycemic control among insulin-using adults with type 2 diabetes.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We studied all 1,333 eligible members of a large not-for-profit health maintenance organization
who responded to a 1997 survey. We tested associations among demographic, treatment, and psychometric variables with mean
1997 HbA1c values. The Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) instrument was used to assess the emotional effect of living with
diabetes, and the Short Form 12 Physical Function Scale was used to assess the effect of physical limitations on daily activities.
Based on differences between and within treatment groups, we built models to predict glycemic control for subgroups of subjects
who were using insulin alone and those who were using insulin in combination with an oral hypoglycemic agent. RESULTS: Younger
age, lower BMI, and increased emotional distress about diabetes (according to the PAID scale) were all significant predictors
(P < 0.05) of worse glycemic control. However, except among individuals with an HbA1c level of >8.0 who were receiving combination
therapy, only approximately 10% of the variance in glycemic control could be predicted by demographic, treatment, or psychometric
characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Personal characteristics explain little of the variation in glycemic control in insulin-using
adults with type 2 diabetes. Possible explanations are that the reduced complexity of control in type 2 diabetes makes the
disease less sensitive to personal factors than control in type 1 diabetes, that health-related behavior is less driven by
personal and environmental characteristics among older individuals, or that, in populations exposed to aggressive glycemic
control with oral hypoglycemic agents and nurse care managers, personal differences become largely irrelevant. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0149-5992 1935-5548 |
DOI: | 10.2337/diacare.23.3.273 |