Improvement of Temperature Prediction Method for Traction Contact
This report proposes a method of improving the temperature prediction model for traction drive contact portion in order to improve prediction accuracy of the maximum traction coefficient, and then describes verification of this method. In our previous report, a method of estimating the maximum tract...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | SAE International journal of engines 2016-04, Vol.9 (3), p.1891-1901, Article 2016-01-1110 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This report proposes a method of improving the temperature prediction model for traction drive contact portion in order to improve prediction accuracy of the maximum traction coefficient, and then describes verification of this method.
In our previous report, a method of estimating the maximum traction coefficient by expressing conditions inside the contact ellipse using a simple combination of viscosity and plasticity was proposed. For the rise in oil film temperature, a calculation model is used that considers maximum temperature to be the typical value. Furthermore, a thin film temperature sensor technology was developed to directly measure the temperature of traction contact of a four-roller experimental apparatus and a variator in an actual transmission, and its validity was confirmed. When measured values of the traction coefficientμwere compared with calculated ones, it was learned thatμestimation accuracy decreased under certain low-contact-pressure and high-sliding conditions. The factor that causedμestimation accuracy to decrease under these load conditions was presumed to be an error in oil film temperature estimation. Therefore, by partially improving the temperature prediction model, that factor was identified and examined.
In the end, the maximum traction coefficient was estimated using the new calculation model and compared with the measured values. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1946-3936 1946-3944 1946-3944 |
DOI: | 10.4271/2016-01-1110 |