Poverty and Charity: Early Analytical Conflicts between Institutional Economics and Neoclassicism
One of the defining characteristics of the difference between institutional economics and neoclassicism is the treatment of the lower income classes and charitable institutions. The modern neoclassical paradigm provides a very narrow economic analysis of poverty. Institutional economics has a more c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of economic issues 1998-06, Vol.32 (2), p.433-440 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | One of the defining characteristics of the difference between institutional economics and neoclassicism is the treatment of the lower income classes and charitable institutions. The modern neoclassical paradigm provides a very narrow economic analysis of poverty. Institutional economics has a more comprehensive and coherent analysis of poverty within capitalism. Both of these theoretical views can be traced to their intellectual origins. Early conceptualization of poverty and charity in neoclassical and institutional literature is reviewed. A historical analysis of how the early differences in approach led to the divergent treatment of poverty and charity in current institutionalism and neoclassical economics is provided. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0021-3624 1946-326X |
DOI: | 10.1080/00213624.1998.11506049 |